Talk:Black market (organization)/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Black market (organization)/Archive 1
More actions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm kind of iffy on having this as it's own article, because it's more of a going-on than an organization, but then again there's ''kind of'' and organization, so I guess we should keep it, ering on the side of caution.--[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 21:09, 28 January 2006 (EST) | I'm kind of iffy on having this as it's own article, because it's more of a going-on than an organization, but then again there's ''kind of'' and organization, so I guess we should keep it, ering on the side of caution.--[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 21:09, 28 January 2006 (EST) | ||
:Given that it has a head and a central hub, I think its safe to say that this is an organization. --[[User:BMS|BMS]] 21:14, 28 January 2006 (EST) | :Given that it has a head and a central hub, I think its safe to say that this is an organization. One thing I did have a problem with, however, while writing the article, is the fact that I had to use an episode as a time reference. Is either a) that okay? or b) can someone think of a logical way to reword it? --[[User:BMS|BMS]] 21:14, 28 January 2006 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 02:15, 29 January 2006
I'm kind of iffy on having this as it's own article, because it's more of a going-on than an organization, but then again there's kind of and organization, so I guess we should keep it, ering on the side of caution.--Ricimer 21:09, 28 January 2006 (EST)
- Given that it has a head and a central hub, I think its safe to say that this is an organization. One thing I did have a problem with, however, while writing the article, is the fact that I had to use an episode as a time reference. Is either a) that okay? or b) can someone think of a logical way to reword it? --BMS 21:14, 28 January 2006 (EST)