Steelviper (talk | contribs) Do not add the RfA to Battlestar Wiki:Requests for adminship yet? |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Use of the RFA== | ==Use of the RFA== | ||
Is the RFA template ready for use yet? I was just worried about where it says "Do not add the RfA to Battlestar Wiki:Requests for adminship yet." at [[Battlestar Wiki:Requests for adminship/nominate]]. (I added the new unified RFA template at Spencerians nomination, but when I noticed the code spilling through a little bit I double checked the RFA/nominate page, and then removed it (presumably until Joe gets it up and running 100%). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 08:32, 21 December 2005 (EST) | Is the RFA template ready for use yet? I was just worried about where it says "Do not add the RfA to Battlestar Wiki:Requests for adminship yet." at [[Battlestar Wiki:Requests for adminship/nominate]]. (I added the new unified RFA template at Spencerians nomination, but when I noticed the code spilling through a little bit I double checked the RFA/nominate page, and then removed it (presumably until Joe gets it up and running 100%). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 08:32, 21 December 2005 (EST) | ||
:I thought that warning was there so that the accepting nominee would add their nomination page to the RfA page proper. Maybe I was mistaken? --[[User:Day|Day]] 13:37, 21 December 2005 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 18:37, 21 December 2005
Use of the RFA
Is the RFA template ready for use yet? I was just worried about where it says "Do not add the RfA to Battlestar Wiki:Requests for adminship yet." at Battlestar Wiki:Requests for adminship/nominate. (I added the new unified RFA template at Spencerians nomination, but when I noticed the code spilling through a little bit I double checked the RFA/nominate page, and then removed it (presumably until Joe gets it up and running 100%). --Steelviper 08:32, 21 December 2005 (EST)
- I thought that warning was there so that the accepting nominee would add their nomination page to the RfA page proper. Maybe I was mistaken? --Day 13:37, 21 December 2005 (EST)