Spencerian (talk | contribs) New section: Expansion |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
This article strikes me as rather weak. Along with other position articles such as the even-weaker [[CMO]] and [[ECM]], this and other pages could use a looksie to determine if it would be better to combine these positions into one article, a la [[Military Ranks (RDM)]]. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 15:41, 17 March 2008 (CDT) | This article strikes me as rather weak. Along with other position articles such as the even-weaker [[CMO]] and [[ECM]], this and other pages could use a looksie to determine if it would be better to combine these positions into one article, a la [[Military Ranks (RDM)]]. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 15:41, 17 March 2008 (CDT) | ||
:ECM has nothing whatsoever to do to with this. You might think of [[ECO]], but that actually has some substance. I can see a general position article, but then there are so many trivial mini-articles about pointless things (like listing every single Raptor or Viper that was merely mentioned in chatter), that this one hardly matters. But instead of anew article, this one could be merged with [[Senior Staff of Galactica]] which already has position histories. What would make more sense to me is a "position" category to link these articles about the staff a bit. -- [[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:45, 17 March 2008 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 21:45, 17 March 2008
Shouldn't this redirect to Military Ranks??? --lordmutt 11:29, 4 November 2006 (EST)
- No, because XO is a position and not a rank --Serenity 19:32, 3 November 2006 (EST)
Ah your right --lordmutt 11:37, 4 November 2006 (EST)
Expansion[edit]
This article strikes me as rather weak. Along with other position articles such as the even-weaker CMO and ECM, this and other pages could use a looksie to determine if it would be better to combine these positions into one article, a la Military Ranks (RDM). --Spencerian 15:41, 17 March 2008 (CDT)
- ECM has nothing whatsoever to do to with this. You might think of ECO, but that actually has some substance. I can see a general position article, but then there are so many trivial mini-articles about pointless things (like listing every single Raptor or Viper that was merely mentioned in chatter), that this one hardly matters. But instead of anew article, this one could be merged with Senior Staff of Galactica which already has position histories. What would make more sense to me is a "position" category to link these articles about the staff a bit. -- Serenity 16:45, 17 March 2008 (CDT)