Talk:Destroyed battlestar/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Destroyed battlestar/Archive 1
More actions
question |
Spencerian (talk | contribs) +reply |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Since "[[Razor]]" shows up many frakked up battlestars, is this even necessary now? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 16:58, 11 December 2007 (CST) | Since "[[Razor]]" shows up many frakked up battlestars, is this even necessary now? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 16:58, 11 December 2007 (CST) | ||
:Perhaps an expansion for the anal-retentive among us who ''have'' to catalog every single battlestar shown in the show. That way there's a page that says, <nowiki><envallmode>"Yes, we ''know'' about dead battlestar #3...''here's your page.''"</envallmodeoff></nowiki> Prevents us from making more separate pages. To my count, we can add the one Galactica type and the two or three seen in Razor. The page'll work like the [[Unnamed characters (RDM)]] page. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 17:08, 11 December 2007 (CST) |
Revision as of 23:08, 11 December 2007
Since "Razor" shows up many frakked up battlestars, is this even necessary now? -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New 16:58, 11 December 2007 (CST)
- Perhaps an expansion for the anal-retentive among us who have to catalog every single battlestar shown in the show. That way there's a page that says, <envallmode>"Yes, we ''know'' about dead battlestar #3...''here's your page.''"</envallmodeoff> Prevents us from making more separate pages. To my count, we can add the one Galactica type and the two or three seen in Razor. The page'll work like the Unnamed characters (RDM) page. --Spencerian 17:08, 11 December 2007 (CST)