Battlestar Wiki:Featured articles/Debate for November 2007: Difference between revisions
From the only original and legitimate Battlestar Wiki: the free-as-in-beer, non-corporate, open-content encyclopedia, analytical reference, and episode guide on all things Battlestar Galactica. Accept neither subpar substitutes nor subpar clones.
More actions
Spencerian (talk | contribs) +vote |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* {{support}} This article is filled with the juicy bits that make reading Battlestar Wiki a joy. The layout, the detail, the references, all good. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 22:04, 16 October 2007 (CDT) | * {{support}} This article is filled with the juicy bits that make reading Battlestar Wiki a joy. The layout, the detail, the references, all good. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 22:04, 16 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
* {{comment}} Looks good. Some more noms wouldn't heard, but I can't really think of anything. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 10:57, 26 October 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 15:57, 26 October 2007
Debate for November 2007
Support This article is filled with the juicy bits that make reading Battlestar Wiki a joy. The layout, the detail, the references, all good. --Spencerian 22:04, 16 October 2007 (CDT)
Comment Looks good. Some more noms wouldn't heard, but I can't really think of anything. --Serenity 10:57, 26 October 2007 (CDT)
