Talk:Encyclopedia Galactica/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Encyclopedia Galactica/Archive 1
(→Canon/Research: reply) |
Spencerian (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This just goes to show that just because somebody gets published, it shouldn't imply that they did any research or that their work is necessarily worthy of citation. I'll take the BG Concordance any day (though that may not be a fair comparison). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 03:01, 5 October 2007 (CDT) | This just goes to show that just because somebody gets published, it shouldn't imply that they did any research or that their work is necessarily worthy of citation. I'll take the BG Concordance any day (though that may not be a fair comparison). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 03:01, 5 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
: Yeah, this clunker is pretty bad. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 03:07, 5 October 2007 (CDT) | : Yeah, this clunker is pretty bad. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 03:07, 5 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
::We're not using any of this material without a secondary source to back it up, I'm hoping. Otherwise, this article should be its own epitaph... --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 07:57, 5 October 2007 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:57, 5 October 2007
Canon/Research
This just goes to show that just because somebody gets published, it shouldn't imply that they did any research or that their work is necessarily worthy of citation. I'll take the BG Concordance any day (though that may not be a fair comparison). --Steelviper 03:01, 5 October 2007 (CDT)
- Yeah, this clunker is pretty bad. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New 03:07, 5 October 2007 (CDT)
- We're not using any of this material without a secondary source to back it up, I'm hoping. Otherwise, this article should be its own epitaph... --Spencerian 07:57, 5 October 2007 (CDT)