Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Talk:JP/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of JP/Archive 1
Spencerian (talk | contribs)
+reply
OTW (talk | contribs)
Is there any need for this article?
Line 5: Line 5:


:I generally attempt not to have orphan references (that is, only one footnote), and both items were real-world notations contrasting and comparing. The reference area now looks sparse, but in this case the note is made more visible, and probably is a better arrangement. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 10:40, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
:I generally attempt not to have orphan references (that is, only one footnote), and both items were real-world notations contrasting and comparing. The reference area now looks sparse, but in this case the note is made more visible, and probably is a better arrangement. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 10:40, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
== Is there any need for this article? ==
It seems this article basically replicates what's said in [[Substances_in_the_Re-imagined_Series#Water]]. Would a redirect be more appropriate? [[User:OTW|OTW]] 18:35, 26 August 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 23:35, 26 August 2007

JP =~ Pint?[edit]

Where was it mentioned that a JP is approximately one pint? Also, shouldn't that be in the main body of the article instead of in the references section? --Catrope(Talk to me or e-mail me) 09:48, 9 May 2007 (CDT)

It's here. Sorry for the clutter. --Catrope(Talk to me or e-mail me) 09:50, 9 May 2007 (CDT)

I generally attempt not to have orphan references (that is, only one footnote), and both items were real-world notations contrasting and comparing. The reference area now looks sparse, but in this case the note is made more visible, and probably is a better arrangement. --Spencerian 10:40, 9 May 2007 (CDT)

Is there any need for this article?[edit]

It seems this article basically replicates what's said in Substances_in_the_Re-imagined_Series#Water. Would a redirect be more appropriate? OTW 18:35, 26 August 2007 (CDT)