More actions
Further thoughts |
→Necessary?: vd |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Why is this article here? There's no mention of anything Galctica in the main body, just in the examples. We're not a dictionary...so I would recommend that this article be deleted and any links to it can be linked the the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin-off_%28media%29 Wikipedia version] of the article.--[[User:RUSnooky|RUSnooky]] 08:31, 19 July 2007 (CDT) | Why is this article here? There's no mention of anything Galctica in the main body, just in the examples. We're not a dictionary...so I would recommend that this article be deleted and any links to it can be linked the the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin-off_%28media%29 Wikipedia version] of the article.--[[User:RUSnooky|RUSnooky]] 08:31, 19 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
:We could even add references to "Re-imagining" on their list of types of spin-offs.--[[User:RUSnooky|RUSnooky]] 08:36, 19 July 2007 (CDT) | :We could even add references to "Re-imagining" on their list of types of spin-offs.--[[User:RUSnooky|RUSnooky]] 08:36, 19 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
::{{vd}} per RUSnooky. Too generic. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])</sup> 05:35, 20 July 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 10:35, 20 July 2007
Necessary?
Why is this article here? There's no mention of anything Galctica in the main body, just in the examples. We're not a dictionary...so I would recommend that this article be deleted and any links to it can be linked the the Wikipedia version of the article.--RUSnooky 08:31, 19 July 2007 (CDT)
- We could even add references to "Re-imagining" on their list of types of spin-offs.--RUSnooky 08:36, 19 July 2007 (CDT)
Delete per RUSnooky. Too generic. --Catrope(Talk to me or e-mail me) 05:35, 20 July 2007 (CDT)
