Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Talk:External visions/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of External visions/Archive 1
Bradtem (talk | contribs)
New page: This page was somehow lost in the re-edit and rename of the Cylon related hallucinations page. Over time, the number of visions, compulsions, virtual beings and prophecies has grown that ...
 
Spencerian (talk | contribs)
Voice problems and other issues
Line 1: Line 1:
This page was somehow lost in the re-edit and rename of the Cylon related hallucinations page.  Over time, the number of visions, compulsions, virtual beings and prophecies has grown that I think it is valuable to collect the related information in one place.  It this was deleted deliberately rather than by accident, let us know the reason for the deletion.--[[User:Bradtem|Bradtem]] 18:29, 9 April 2007 (CDT)
This page was somehow lost in the re-edit and rename of the Cylon related hallucinations page.  Over time, the number of visions, compulsions, virtual beings and prophecies has grown that I think it is valuable to collect the related information in one place.  It this was deleted deliberately rather than by accident, let us know the reason for the deletion.--[[User:Bradtem|Bradtem]] 18:29, 9 April 2007 (CDT)
== Voice problems and other issues ==
I like this article, but it could stand a bit of reworking to give its in-universe voice more zest, as well as lots of referencing and links. I'm marking it for cleanup for that reason. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 17:21, 21 June 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 22:21, 21 June 2007

This page was somehow lost in the re-edit and rename of the Cylon related hallucinations page. Over time, the number of visions, compulsions, virtual beings and prophecies has grown that I think it is valuable to collect the related information in one place. It this was deleted deliberately rather than by accident, let us know the reason for the deletion.--Bradtem 18:29, 9 April 2007 (CDT)

Voice problems and other issues

I like this article, but it could stand a bit of reworking to give its in-universe voice more zest, as well as lots of referencing and links. I'm marking it for cleanup for that reason. --Spencerian 17:21, 21 June 2007 (CDT)