Spencerian (talk | contribs) +dang it |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In which podcast did RDM state that Kara is not a Cylon? I don't remember any explicit statements in the [[Podcast:Crossroads, Part II|Crossroads, Part II podcast]]. -- [[User:Gordon Ecker|Gordon Ecker]] 23:14, 20 April 2007 (CDT) | In which podcast did RDM state that Kara is not a Cylon? I don't remember any explicit statements in the [[Podcast:Crossroads, Part II|Crossroads, Part II podcast]]. -- [[User:Gordon Ecker|Gordon Ecker]] 23:14, 20 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
:You're right. I'll remove the note, but I'm sure I heard it somewhere, dang it. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 00:11, 21 April 2007 (CDT) | :You're right. I'll remove the note, but I'm sure I heard it somewhere, dang it. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 00:11, 21 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
:David Eick did say in the [http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/tv/la-et-starbuck4apr04,1,334914.story LA Times]:--[[User:Bradtem|Bradtem]] 14:28, 21 April 2007 (CDT) | |||
"My goal was to mislead the audience into thinking Kara Thrace was a | |||
Cylon," Eick said. Being a Cylon, after all, would mean that there | |||
were many copies of her, and therefore Sackhoff could come back as a | |||
different version of Starbuck. | |||
Revision as of 19:28, 21 April 2007
In which podcast did RDM state that Kara is not a Cylon? I don't remember any explicit statements in the Crossroads, Part II podcast. -- Gordon Ecker 23:14, 20 April 2007 (CDT)
- You're right. I'll remove the note, but I'm sure I heard it somewhere, dang it. --Spencerian 00:11, 21 April 2007 (CDT)
- David Eick did say in the LA Times:--Bradtem 14:28, 21 April 2007 (CDT)
"My goal was to mislead the audience into thinking Kara Thrace was a Cylon," Eick said. Being a Cylon, after all, would mean that there were many copies of her, and therefore Sackhoff could come back as a different version of Starbuck.