reply |
No edit summary |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Hey, page authors: spoilers from hidden fields on this page are showing up in Google right now! If you Google "Romo Lampkin" you'll see them, even though they're not visible on this page. And Google searches don't have spoiler warnings so guys, maybe you should get rid of those hidden fields altogether and wait till the facts have been revealed? I've already been spoiled now myself but I'm not mad. I'm not removing the fields because it's really up to you. But I thought you should be aware. --[[User:njgreen|njgreen]] 06:45, 12 March 2007 (EST) | Hey, page authors: spoilers from hidden fields on this page are showing up in Google right now! If you Google "Romo Lampkin" you'll see them, even though they're not visible on this page. And Google searches don't have spoiler warnings so guys, maybe you should get rid of those hidden fields altogether and wait till the facts have been revealed? I've already been spoiled now myself but I'm not mad. I'm not removing the fields because it's really up to you. But I thought you should be aware. --[[User:njgreen|njgreen]] 06:45, 12 March 2007 (EST) | ||
:Interesting. However, please refer to our [[BW:SP|spoiler policy]], which should address your questions on the subject. Typically any "spoilers" are pretty well sourced, so the facts are revealed, per se, just not in the episode itself. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 06:02, 12 March 2007 (CDT) | :Interesting. However, please refer to our [[BW:SP|spoiler policy]], which should address your questions on the subject. Typically any "spoilers" are pretty well sourced, so the facts are revealed, per se, just not in the episode itself. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 06:02, 12 March 2007 (CDT) | ||
::Thanks for pointing me at the policy page. I am a little new here so apologies for any misunderstanding on my part. My concern is that these spoilers are in HTML hidden fields, so it seems that they may not be intended to be visible to anyone, even to page viewers who see warnings. Meanwhile, anyone doing a casual Google search on Lampkin will see the spoiler rights away (it's only the 6th result on the page). In other words, you can see spoilers on Google that page viewers themselves can't see (without a view source anyway). If that is still consistent with the policy, fine - as I said I'm not particularly exercised about it but I just thought you should know. Love the site, by the way.--[[User:njgreen|njgreen]] 07:57, 12 March 2007 (EST) |
Revision as of 12:05, 12 March 2007
I bet you 50 cubits that this fellow is a Cylon. --Volostheguardian 23:15, 9 December 2006 (CST)
- I certainly hope he isn't. --Sauron18 23:56, 9 December 2006 (CST)
- Cylon or not he'll most likely be a "baddie", cus the actor always is. lol --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 06:49, 10 December 2006 (CST)
- Actually it's Romo Lampkin.
- http://www.sidesexpress.com/se_index.cfm?locid=5&task=type&l=5&c=battlestar#sr
- --Deus 07:00, 10 December 2006 (CST)
- Yeah, I was only about 90% certain about the exact pronunciation of his name when I listened to the podcast. That's why I didn't feel I should create this page and only posted it on The Son Also Rises--Straycat0 10:39, 10 December 2006 (CST)
- Cylon or not he'll most likely be a "baddie", cus the actor always is. lol --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 06:49, 10 December 2006 (CST)
- Sauron18... a "lawyer" would be a perfect fit for a Cylon. Shane (T - C - E) 18:24, 6 January 2007 (CST)
- Well, does he look like any of these guys? Anyway, it's certainly not a bet I'd take! Though I think it would be cooler if, as a force of evil, he was human but somehow in cahoots with the Cylons, rather like Morden from Babylon 5. --Saforrest 19:57, 26 February 2007 (CST)
- Please please please ignore what the final five look like in that picture! They are only standins used for the promotional image and are never seen on screen. --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 03:53, 27 February 2007 (CST)
- My apologies. I knew those five were only stand-ins; I should have qualified that so as not to lead anyone astray. --Saforrest 08:32, 5 March 2007 (CST)
- Please please please ignore what the final five look like in that picture! They are only standins used for the promotional image and are never seen on screen. --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 03:53, 27 February 2007 (CST)
Hey, page authors: spoilers from hidden fields on this page are showing up in Google right now! If you Google "Romo Lampkin" you'll see them, even though they're not visible on this page. And Google searches don't have spoiler warnings so guys, maybe you should get rid of those hidden fields altogether and wait till the facts have been revealed? I've already been spoiled now myself but I'm not mad. I'm not removing the fields because it's really up to you. But I thought you should be aware. --njgreen 06:45, 12 March 2007 (EST)
- Interesting. However, please refer to our spoiler policy, which should address your questions on the subject. Typically any "spoilers" are pretty well sourced, so the facts are revealed, per se, just not in the episode itself. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 06:02, 12 March 2007 (CDT)
- Thanks for pointing me at the policy page. I am a little new here so apologies for any misunderstanding on my part. My concern is that these spoilers are in HTML hidden fields, so it seems that they may not be intended to be visible to anyone, even to page viewers who see warnings. Meanwhile, anyone doing a casual Google search on Lampkin will see the spoiler rights away (it's only the 6th result on the page). In other words, you can see spoilers on Google that page viewers themselves can't see (without a view source anyway). If that is still consistent with the policy, fine - as I said I'm not particularly exercised about it but I just thought you should know. Love the site, by the way.--njgreen 07:57, 12 March 2007 (EST)