No edit summary |
→Bad language: reply |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:Yes. One or more contributors lately has been placing non-neutral language in analysis sections, While the information is interesting, its tone is not, so please neutralize the writing as you encounter it. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 06:48, 4 December 2006 (CST) | :Yes. One or more contributors lately has been placing non-neutral language in analysis sections, While the information is interesting, its tone is not, so please neutralize the writing as you encounter it. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 06:48, 4 December 2006 (CST) | ||
:Though that's one of the worst (best?) examples, a lot of the TOS articles read more like personal reviews than wiki articles. Not sure how far that has been fixed yet --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 10:47, 4 December 2006 (CST) | :Though that's one of the worst (best?) examples, a lot of the TOS articles read more like personal reviews than wiki articles. Not sure how far that has been fixed yet --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 10:47, 4 December 2006 (CST) | ||
I've reworked much of the episode guide, particularly the Analysis section. Please comment, change, or modify as you deem fit. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 13:18, 4 December 2006 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 19:18, 4 December 2006
This episode's summary was taken from the Wikipedia article List of Battlestar Galactica episodes by User:BillCook, who has agreed to release his contributions into the public domain. --Peter Farago 18:17, 31 August 2005 (EDT)
Bad language
"A rather average episode of the original series.", "Yes, that's John de Lancie in that motorcycle helmet! Recognize the voice? Yes, it's the same actor that played the infamous Q in Star Trek: the Next Generation." - Sounds pretty POVish and un-encyclopaedic language. MatthewFenton 06:03, 4 December 2006 (CST)
- Yes. One or more contributors lately has been placing non-neutral language in analysis sections, While the information is interesting, its tone is not, so please neutralize the writing as you encounter it. --Spencerian 06:48, 4 December 2006 (CST)
- Though that's one of the worst (best?) examples, a lot of the TOS articles read more like personal reviews than wiki articles. Not sure how far that has been fixed yet --Serenity 10:47, 4 December 2006 (CST)
I've reworked much of the episode guide, particularly the Analysis section. Please comment, change, or modify as you deem fit. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 13:18, 4 December 2006 (CST)