Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Battlestar Wiki talk:Think Tank/Separate continuity: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Battlestar Wiki:Think Tank/Separate continuity
Spencerian (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Joe Beaudoin Jr. (talk | contribs)
reply
Line 1: Line 1:
As noted in the TT, we already perform the use of separate continuity, but there's no policy established for it. It works well, but with a policy we can enforce content in the future without ripping it from the wiki, as it does belong, but just in its proper section, like juvunile books in a library. Comments? --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 14:45, 9 October 2006 (CDT)
As noted in the TT, we already perform the use of separate continuity, but there's no policy established for it. It works well, but with a policy we can enforce content in the future without ripping it from the wiki, as it does belong, but just in its proper section, like juvunile books in a library. Comments? --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 14:45, 9 October 2006 (CDT)
: Sounds quite fine to me -- it's naturally what we do already anyway. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 15:53, 9 October 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 20:53, 9 October 2006

As noted in the TT, we already perform the use of separate continuity, but there's no policy established for it. It works well, but with a policy we can enforce content in the future without ripping it from the wiki, as it does belong, but just in its proper section, like juvunile books in a library. Comments? --Spencerian 14:45, 9 October 2006 (CDT)

Sounds quite fine to me -- it's naturally what we do already anyway. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 15:53, 9 October 2006 (CDT)