Battlestar Wiki:Featured articles/Debate for October 2006: Difference between revisions
From Battlestar Wiki, the free, open content Battlestar Galactica encyclopedia and episode guide
More actions
No edit summary |
m Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus" |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== [[The Battlestar Galactica Drinking Game]] == | == [[The Battlestar Galactica Drinking Game]] == | ||
* {{oppose}}. Funny, but inconsistent. Also, a silly page has to be exceedingly silly to overshadow a non-silly page, in my opinion. Close, though. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 16:11, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | * {{oppose}}. Funny, but inconsistent. Also, a silly page has to be exceedingly silly to overshadow a non-silly page, in my opinion. Close, though. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 16:11, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
* {{oppose}}. As the original creator, I feel that the drinking game is in drastic need of revision. --[[User: | * {{oppose}}. As the original creator, I feel that the drinking game is in drastic need of revision. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 18:13, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
* {{oppose}} --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 18:27, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | * {{oppose}} --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 18:27, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
* {{oppose}} I nominated it only as a joke. --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 21:03, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | * {{oppose}} I nominated it only as a joke. --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 21:03, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== [[Cylon agent]] == | == [[Cylon agent]] == | ||
*Comment - could use some information currently hosted in [[Cylon Models]]. --[[User: | *Comment - could use some information currently hosted in [[Cylon Models]]. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 19:40, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
*Comment - I believe it could stand to be revised. I'm not entirely sure whether or not we should be including information on Isis/Hera in there either, despite the "Nubmer Thirteen" statement Gina made to Biers' in a deleted scene. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 19:59, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | *Comment - I believe it could stand to be revised. I'm not entirely sure whether or not we should be including information on Isis/Hera in there either, despite the "Nubmer Thirteen" statement Gina made to Biers' in a deleted scene. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 19:59, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
* Comment: I love the theory here. Blows [[Wikipedia:Warp drive|warp drive]] out of the water. But... --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 16:11, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | * Comment: I love the theory here. Blows [[Wikipedia:Warp drive|warp drive]] out of the water. But... --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 16:11, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
* {{oppose}}. An article focusing on technobabble is not representative of this character-driven show. --[[User: | * {{oppose}}. An article focusing on technobabble is not representative of this character-driven show. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 18:14, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
* {{support}}. I generally don't like extensive discussions of made-up technology, but it's a well written article. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 18:21, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | * {{support}}. I generally don't like extensive discussions of made-up technology, but it's a well written article. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 18:21, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
* {{oppose}}. I see Peter's point about this article not necessarily being representative of this being a character-driven show. At the same time, however, the article is well written and could be a featured article. The major weakness in this article is the lack of verifiable sources, particularly the notes on its feasibility and the Kip Thorne/Carl Sagan items in the article. The only reference to these items are Wikipedia, a resource that should never be used as either primary or secondary source of information. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 20:07, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | * {{oppose}}. I see Peter's point about this article not necessarily being representative of this being a character-driven show. At the same time, however, the article is well written and could be a featured article. The major weakness in this article is the lack of verifiable sources, particularly the notes on its feasibility and the Kip Thorne/Carl Sagan items in the article. The only reference to these items are Wikipedia, a resource that should never be used as either primary or secondary source of information. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 20:07, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 01:54, 11 April 2020
| ||
|---|---|---|
| DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.
This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current talk page. |
The Battlestar Galactica Drinking Game
Oppose. Funny, but inconsistent. Also, a silly page has to be exceedingly silly to overshadow a non-silly page, in my opinion. Close, though. --Spencerian 16:11, 2 October 2006 (CDT)- Oppose. As the original creator, I feel that the drinking game is in drastic need of revision. --April Arcus 18:13, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
- Oppose --Shane (T - C - E) 18:27, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
- Oppose I nominated it only as a joke. --BklynBruzer 21:03, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
- Oppose I agree with Peter about it needed a decent cleanup --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 03:29, 3 October 2006 (CDT)
Cylon agent
- Comment - could use some information currently hosted in Cylon Models. --April Arcus 19:40, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
- Comment - I believe it could stand to be revised. I'm not entirely sure whether or not we should be including information on Isis/Hera in there either, despite the "Nubmer Thirteen" statement Gina made to Biers' in a deleted scene. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 19:59, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
FTL
- Comment: I love the theory here. Blows warp drive out of the water. But... --Spencerian 16:11, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
- Oppose. An article focusing on technobabble is not representative of this character-driven show. --April Arcus 18:14, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
Support. I generally don't like extensive discussions of made-up technology, but it's a well written article. --Serenity 18:21, 2 October 2006 (CDT)- Oppose. I see Peter's point about this article not necessarily being representative of this being a character-driven show. At the same time, however, the article is well written and could be a featured article. The major weakness in this article is the lack of verifiable sources, particularly the notes on its feasibility and the Kip Thorne/Carl Sagan items in the article. The only reference to these items are Wikipedia, a resource that should never be used as either primary or secondary source of information. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 20:07, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
- Oppose as well. --Shane (T - C - E) 20:30, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
William Adama
- Support --Shane (T - C - E) 20:32, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
- Support A good article about possibly the most important character in the show. --BklynBruzer 21:04, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
- Support. That is a good one, and we've been techno-heavy lately. Vote's changed. --Spencerian 23:01, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
- Support --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 03:28, 3 October 2006 (CDT)