Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:::::As I recall, this article already underwent a namechange... However, that's not really the point, so I will agree with Peter's suggestion of going with "Production errors (RDM)", simply because it is inclusive of ''all'' the errors that happen on screen. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 21:13, 22 July 2006 (CDT) | :::::As I recall, this article already underwent a namechange... However, that's not really the point, so I will agree with Peter's suggestion of going with "Production errors (RDM)", simply because it is inclusive of ''all'' the errors that happen on screen. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 21:13, 22 July 2006 (CDT) | ||
::::::Though, 'Conituity Errors' should be in there somewhere because a continuity errors affect the story where other production errors don't necessarily. A Prop, equipment, or crew visibility error doesn't affect whats going on but the miscount in the number of months to the election does play. Maybe a separate page should be made for productions errors outside of continuity errors. --[[User:StrayCat0|StrayCat0]] 21:53, 22 July 2006 (PDT) | ::::::Though, 'Conituity Errors' should be in there somewhere because a continuity errors affect the story where other production errors don't necessarily. A Prop, equipment, or crew visibility error doesn't affect whats going on but the miscount in the number of months to the election does play. Maybe a separate page should be made for productions errors outside of continuity errors. --[[User:StrayCat0|StrayCat0]] 21:53, 22 July 2006 (PDT) | ||
:::::::No. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 00:43, 23 July 2006 (CDT) |
Revision as of 05:43, 23 July 2006
Is it clear that the acting change for Zak Adama was for casting reasons, or possibly the change from an extra to a fully fledged actor? --Radicaledward 06:21, 9 Aug 2005 (EDT)
Linking Baltar/Adar image to this page to "adopt it" (It's not visible, but it's there). --Steelviper 09:10, 31 January 2006 (EST)
Isn't the Pyramid entry in Retcon section incorrect? I don't remember them actually ever saying the card game was named Pyramid. --FrankieG 18:14, 13 June 2006 (CDT)
Name change
Should the name of this page be changed to "Goofs" or something as it coveres other gaffes not just continuity errors? --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 03:25, 28 June 2006 (CDT)
- You are right. It should be called something like "Production Errors". --StrayCat0 22:36, 21 July 2006 (PDT)
- No. The current name is better and more accurate. --The Merovingian (C - E) 02:11, 22 July 2006 (CDT)
- How about "Production and Continuity errors." --Talos 10:01, 22 July 2006 (CDT)
- How is Danglers, Recasting, Prop and Equipment Errors and Crew Visible Continuity error?? These are obviously production errors? Danglers aren't really errors, maybe scripting issues, maybe something they'll leave for later, they're prone to that. I like "Production and Continuity Errors". --StrayCat0 10:35, 22 July 2006 (PDT)
- How about "Production and Continuity errors." --Talos 10:01, 22 July 2006 (CDT)
- No. The current name is better and more accurate. --The Merovingian (C - E) 02:11, 22 July 2006 (CDT)
- Talos' suggestion is quite sensible, and I support it. --The Merovingian (C - E) 15:07, 22 July 2006 (CDT)
- Production errors include continuity errors, so "Production errors (RDM)" should win by virtue of concision. --Peter Farago 20:26, 22 July 2006 (CDT)
- As I recall, this article already underwent a namechange... However, that's not really the point, so I will agree with Peter's suggestion of going with "Production errors (RDM)", simply because it is inclusive of all the errors that happen on screen. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 21:13, 22 July 2006 (CDT)
- Though, 'Conituity Errors' should be in there somewhere because a continuity errors affect the story where other production errors don't necessarily. A Prop, equipment, or crew visibility error doesn't affect whats going on but the miscount in the number of months to the election does play. Maybe a separate page should be made for productions errors outside of continuity errors. --StrayCat0 21:53, 22 July 2006 (PDT)
- No. --The Merovingian (C - E) 00:43, 23 July 2006 (CDT)
- Though, 'Conituity Errors' should be in there somewhere because a continuity errors affect the story where other production errors don't necessarily. A Prop, equipment, or crew visibility error doesn't affect whats going on but the miscount in the number of months to the election does play. Maybe a separate page should be made for productions errors outside of continuity errors. --StrayCat0 21:53, 22 July 2006 (PDT)
- Talos' suggestion is quite sensible, and I support it. --The Merovingian (C - E) 15:07, 22 July 2006 (CDT)