Spencerian (talk | contribs) |
Steelviper (talk | contribs) FA thoughts |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Comments == | |||
* Two "votes" is fewer than I'd like to see, but it looks like unless somebody else offers any other options we can use Colonial One for the FA on the 7th? (Personally, I was waiting for more "candidates" before weighing in.) --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 10:13, 1 August 2006 (CDT) | |||
== [[Colonial One]] == | == [[Colonial One]] == | ||
* {{Support}} - Has {{tl|quality article}} status and it's very detailed about the ship. [[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 10:22, 13 July 2006 (CDT) | * {{Support}} - Has {{tl|quality article}} status and it's very detailed about the ship. [[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 10:22, 13 July 2006 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 15:13, 1 August 2006
Comments
- Two "votes" is fewer than I'd like to see, but it looks like unless somebody else offers any other options we can use Colonial One for the FA on the 7th? (Personally, I was waiting for more "candidates" before weighing in.) --Steelviper 10:13, 1 August 2006 (CDT)
Colonial One
Support - Has {{quality article}} status and it's very detailed about the ship. Shane (T - C - E) 10:22, 13 July 2006 (CDT)- Support - I'm cool on this article now that I rooted out some edits to standardize it again. --Spencerian 13:20, 14 July 2006 (CDT)
