Talk:Gemenon Liner 1701/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Gemenon Liner 1701/Archive 1
More actions
Spencerian (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Spencerian (talk | contribs) Merge Note |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:The "Gemon" term is inaccurate. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 12:42, 9 May 2006 (CDT) | :The "Gemon" term is inaccurate. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 12:42, 9 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
== Merge Note == | |||
Since all of these ships are the same model, and there is so little total data on them (except, of course, the [[Olympic Carrier]]), I recommend we merge this page with the [[Intersun Passenger Cruiser]] article. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 12:43, 9 May 2006 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 17:43, 9 May 2006
There is a partial picture in the Battlestar Galactica Magazine and it looks nothing like the Gemenon Traveller. I'll try to scan and upload the pic sometime tomorrow. --Ltcrashdown 23:49, 1 February 2006 (EST)
Citation
There's no citation for the main article. Does this happen in the mini-series? --Steelviper 13:44, 2 February 2006 (EST)
- From miniseries dialog, I got the impression that they abandoned this ship after evacuating it. --Ricimer 14:42, 2 February 2006 (EST)
Where is this "Gemon Liners" stuff coming from? Shouldn't it be "Gemenon Liners"? --Noneofyourbusiness
- The "Gemon" term is inaccurate. --Spencerian 12:42, 9 May 2006 (CDT)
Merge Note
Since all of these ships are the same model, and there is so little total data on them (except, of course, the Olympic Carrier), I recommend we merge this page with the Intersun Passenger Cruiser article. --Spencerian 12:43, 9 May 2006 (CDT)