April Arcus (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Corrected minor spelling mistake - [[user:lordmutt|Lordmutt]] 18 February, 2006 | Corrected minor spelling mistake - [[user:lordmutt|Lordmutt]] 18 February, 2006 | ||
I'm not sure if the new bulleted list works or not. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 23:39, 22 March 2006 (CST) | |||
== TOS Basestar == | == TOS Basestar == |
Revision as of 05:39, 23 March 2006
I just registered 5 minutes ago, so be gentle... Is there any reason why the references to BattleStar's and Raiders are neither capitalized, or links?
- Hi! Welcome to the Wiki -- I hope you have a blast here! :-) Anyway, to address your question, Battlestar can be spelled one of two ways ("Battlestar" or "battlestar"). ("BattleStar" is an incorrect spelling, by the way.) As for raiders, you can capitalize them or not; it's similar to writing the "stealth fighter" or "naval carrier" -- you can choose whether or not to capitalize the first letters of each word. As for the links, by default the first letter of any article is capitalized. Why? It's just how the software we use works. :-) Hope that answers your question! -- Joe Beaudoin 16:54, 14 Jun 2005 (EDT)
I noticed that Kuralyov had a number of Talk entries regarding basestars. Was he just tweaking the language?
- Just redirects from the various names used to describe Basestars, so any newcomer will be better able to find it via search. 68.9.113.183 22:23, 15 Jun 2005 (EDT)
- Whoops, I was logged out for some reason when I posted that. Kuralyov 22:24, 15 Jun 2005 (EDT)
Corrected minor spelling mistake - Lordmutt 18 February, 2006
I'm not sure if the new bulleted list works or not. --The Merovingian (C - E) 23:39, 22 March 2006 (CST)
TOS Basestar
Can someone please add a some information about the original basestar.
- See the first line of the article, please. --Day 01:26, 17 January 2006 (EST)
Image placement
So, rather than a revert war: I had shifted one of the images on this page to the left for balance. That's the scheme that's used on many character pages and I think it looks best. However, Bane Grievver seems to disagree but reverted without comment, so I'm soliciting one here. Any particular reason, Bane, or just because that's how it was before? --Day 01:30, 17 January 2006 (EST)
- I liked it your way, FWIW. --Peter Farago 17:10, 17 February 2006 (EST)