More actions
mNo edit summary |
April Arcus (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Only problem is that the actual props/CGI models don't have nose numbers, just a four-digit tail number. In most of the scenes in the mini-series, the tail number matches the designation used over wireless (Apollo's 7242 and Starbuck's 8547, anyway). --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 15:07, 13 December 2005 (EST) | :Only problem is that the actual props/CGI models don't have nose numbers, just a four-digit tail number. In most of the scenes in the mini-series, the tail number matches the designation used over wireless (Apollo's 7242 and Starbuck's 8547, anyway). --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 15:07, 13 December 2005 (EST) | ||
::The nose numbers are on the real US Navy aircraft. I'm sorry if I didn't make that clear. It's just that the 3-digit call numbers don't match with the 4-digit tail numbers. It would make sense for the Mk IIs early in the Mini to not have the 3-digit numbers since they weren't on active flight status. They would likly be assigned numbers later, probably by Ragnar. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 17:12, 13 December 2005 (EST) | ::The nose numbers are on the real US Navy aircraft. I'm sorry if I didn't make that clear. It's just that the 3-digit call numbers don't match with the 4-digit tail numbers. It would make sense for the Mk IIs early in the Mini to not have the 3-digit numbers since they weren't on active flight status. They would likly be assigned numbers later, probably by Ragnar. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 17:12, 13 December 2005 (EST) | ||
:::That seems plausible. Would an individual craft ever be assigned multiple nose numbers? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 17:37, 13 December 2005 (EST) |
Revision as of 22:37, 13 December 2005
The Viper's serial number on nose is 2276NC. However, it's call sign was Viper 450. I believe that the 3-digit numbers like 450 or 591 are like the nose numbers on US Navy aircraft. For example, an F-14A Tomcat could have a serial number like 160299 but, since it is a fighter, it will have nose number in either the 100s or 200s. The Squadron commander's plane usually would have 00 at the end (100, 200, et al). Other aircraft would have nose numbers according to their type. For instance, A-6 Intruder attack planes could all have 400 and 500 series number, regardless of their serial number (That isn't the correct set of nose numbers for A-6s though). In flight operations, the nose number would be used to refer to the plane, just like Apollo when he first landed on Galactica. Captain Kelly referred to him as Viper 450. The 2276NC was visible on the nose (in low-viz markings unlike the Mk II) when Apollo met Tyrol. -By the way, the Tomcat serial number was for the first Tomcat sold to Iran, it ironically never had a Navy nose number. I'll update the main article when I get back from my finals this afternoon. --Talos 12:15, 13 December 2005 (EST)
- Only problem is that the actual props/CGI models don't have nose numbers, just a four-digit tail number. In most of the scenes in the mini-series, the tail number matches the designation used over wireless (Apollo's 7242 and Starbuck's 8547, anyway). --Peter Farago 15:07, 13 December 2005 (EST)
- The nose numbers are on the real US Navy aircraft. I'm sorry if I didn't make that clear. It's just that the 3-digit call numbers don't match with the 4-digit tail numbers. It would make sense for the Mk IIs early in the Mini to not have the 3-digit numbers since they weren't on active flight status. They would likly be assigned numbers later, probably by Ragnar. --Talos 17:12, 13 December 2005 (EST)
- That seems plausible. Would an individual craft ever be assigned multiple nose numbers? --Peter Farago 17:37, 13 December 2005 (EST)
- The nose numbers are on the real US Navy aircraft. I'm sorry if I didn't make that clear. It's just that the 3-digit call numbers don't match with the 4-digit tail numbers. It would make sense for the Mk IIs early in the Mini to not have the 3-digit numbers since they weren't on active flight status. They would likly be assigned numbers later, probably by Ragnar. --Talos 17:12, 13 December 2005 (EST)