Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Talk:Twelve Cylon Models/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Twelve Cylon Models/Archive 1
Spencerian (talk | contribs)
→‎Debate Over, It Seems: -Moving answer to H-C page.
Line 4: Line 4:


:Thank god. For my part, I'd like to nominate this page for deletion. I seriously doubt anyone will ever find our arguments here enlightening. We can footnote the interview as a source where necessary to forestall further debate. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 02:44, 10 November 2005 (EST)
:Thank god. For my part, I'd like to nominate this page for deletion. I seriously doubt anyone will ever find our arguments here enlightening. We can footnote the interview as a source where necessary to forestall further debate. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 02:44, 10 November 2005 (EST)
::I've removed the now-wild speculation on spacecraft and added a delete tag and raised the interview up a level of order for emphasis. Fellow wikipedians. I will incorporate the argument and answer into the Humano-Cylon article today and slate this page for eventual deletion. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 08:40, 10 November 2005 (EST)

Revision as of 13:40, 10 November 2005

Debate Over, It Seems

My recent addition from TheFandom.com (kudos to Ricimer for being the first to spot this) confirms without further debate that there are twelve HUMAN models, and that the other Cylon spacecraft or bots we have seen are not counted. It firmly establishes that Sharon was never a true human, and none of the other models were either. We will still want to keep the arguments for and against this in the article as they were stimulating to read, but we need to truncate them down to Ron's official statement. --Spencerian 12:40, 9 November 2005 (EST)

Thank god. For my part, I'd like to nominate this page for deletion. I seriously doubt anyone will ever find our arguments here enlightening. We can footnote the interview as a source where necessary to forestall further debate. --Peter Farago 02:44, 10 November 2005 (EST)
I've removed the now-wild speculation on spacecraft and added a delete tag and raised the interview up a level of order for emphasis. Fellow wikipedians. I will incorporate the argument and answer into the Humano-Cylon article today and slate this page for eventual deletion. --Spencerian 08:40, 10 November 2005 (EST)