Talk:Computers in the Re-imagined Series/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Computers in the Re-imagined Series/Archive 1
More actions
Spencerian (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Spencerian (talk | contribs) Merge/Splitting Off Computer History |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This was a tough page to build. There have been many references to the computers, and, given that RDM is against [[Technobabble]], there's a limit on what is said to prevent limiting the growth of other stories. As we discover more about the inner computer workings, this should flesh out to be a nice page. (Cisco network engineers and MSCEs need not edit. I like to think that ''Galactica''s more of a UNIX. :) --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 17:24, 21 October 2005 (EDT) | This was a tough page to build. There have been many references to the computers, and, given that RDM is against [[Technobabble]], there's a limit on what is said to prevent limiting the growth of other stories. As we discover more about the inner computer workings, this should flesh out to be a nice page. (Cisco network engineers and MSCEs need not edit. I like to think that ''Galactica''s more of a UNIX. :) --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 17:24, 21 October 2005 (EDT) | ||
== Merge/Splitting Off Computer History == | |||
Per Shane's markup: It's not a bad idea since I bet we'll have more to fill, although we may or may not need as much of a narrative such as what I had originally created. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 15:38, 23 May 2006 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 20:38, 23 May 2006
This was a tough page to build. There have been many references to the computers, and, given that RDM is against Technobabble, there's a limit on what is said to prevent limiting the growth of other stories. As we discover more about the inner computer workings, this should flesh out to be a nice page. (Cisco network engineers and MSCEs need not edit. I like to think that Galacticas more of a UNIX. :) --Spencerian 17:24, 21 October 2005 (EDT)
Merge/Splitting Off Computer History
Per Shane's markup: It's not a bad idea since I bet we'll have more to fill, although we may or may not need as much of a narrative such as what I had originally created. --Spencerian 15:38, 23 May 2006 (CDT)