Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Talk:Numerology/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Numerology/Archive 1
Watcher (talk | contribs)
Peter, take a look
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
Where did this come from? --[[User:Redwall|Redwall]] 15:29, 16 October 2005 (EDT)
Where did this come from? --[[User:Redwall|Redwall]] 15:29, 16 October 2005 (EDT)


::It's from a deleted scene on [http://www.scifi.com/battlestar/ Sci-Fi Channel]'s website.  In [[Kobol's Last Gleaming, Part I]] just before the ill-fated [[Raptor]] mission, [[Elosha]] was discussing the Sacred Scrolls with the [[Roslin]] and [[Gaius Baltar|Baltar]] and [[Number Six|Six]] overhear.  Elosha mentions that "one of the Lords of Kobol" began to think of themselves as superior to the others and felt they should be the sole supreme being as opposed to one of many.  She didn't mention a number or whether it was one of the 12 or a supposed 13th Lord.  When Six heard this she became particularly incensed about it and derided the comment to Baltar as "blasphemy".  Some fans have used this particular deleted scene, regardless of its status in canon to justify theories that perhaps the [[Cylon]] God is in fact a 13th Lord of Kobol.  So whomever said that got it ''half'' right.  [[User:Kahran|Kahran]] 23:21, 17 October 2005 (EDT)
:It's from a deleted scene on [http://www.scifi.com/battlestar/ Sci-Fi Channel]'s website.  In [[Kobol's Last Gleaming, Part I]] just before the ill-fated [[Raptor]] mission, [[Elosha]] was discussing the Sacred Scrolls with the [[Roslin]] and [[Gaius Baltar|Baltar]] and [[Number Six|Six]] overhear.  Elosha mentions that "one of the Lords of Kobol" began to think of themselves as superior to the others and felt they should be the sole supreme being as opposed to one of many.  She didn't mention a number or whether it was one of the 12 or a supposed 13th Lord.  When Six heard this she became particularly incensed about it and derided the comment to Baltar as "blasphemy".  Some fans have used this particular deleted scene, regardless of its status in canon to justify theories that perhaps the [[Cylon]] God is in fact a 13th Lord of Kobol.  So whomever said that got it ''half'' right.  [[User:Kahran|Kahran]] 23:21, 17 October 2005 (EDT)


:::Peter, I recall your taking issue with some of the things in the "13" section. I found them, um... perplexing too. Turns out it wasn't ''completely'' off the wall. See above. --[[User:Watcher|Watcher]] 01:06, 18 October 2005 (EDT)
::Peter, I recall your taking issue with some of the things in the "13" section. I found them, um... perplexing too. Turns out it wasn't ''completely'' off the wall. See above. --[[User:Watcher|Watcher]] 01:06, 18 October 2005 (EDT)
 
:::I see the above (which is fascinating, actually), but still point out that the number "12" is never given, which is what was inappropriate about the mention. [[:Category:Silly Pages|Silly]] is different from [[Battlestar wiki:Citation Jihad|wrong]]. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:15, 18 October 2005 (EDT)

Revision as of 05:15, 18 October 2005

"The Sacred Scrolls say that originally there were 13 gods and that one jealous god broke away from the Twelve to try and claim supremecy, bringing on the destruction of Kobol."

Where did this come from? --Redwall 15:29, 16 October 2005 (EDT)

It's from a deleted scene on Sci-Fi Channel's website. In Kobol's Last Gleaming, Part I just before the ill-fated Raptor mission, Elosha was discussing the Sacred Scrolls with the Roslin and Baltar and Six overhear. Elosha mentions that "one of the Lords of Kobol" began to think of themselves as superior to the others and felt they should be the sole supreme being as opposed to one of many. She didn't mention a number or whether it was one of the 12 or a supposed 13th Lord. When Six heard this she became particularly incensed about it and derided the comment to Baltar as "blasphemy". Some fans have used this particular deleted scene, regardless of its status in canon to justify theories that perhaps the Cylon God is in fact a 13th Lord of Kobol. So whomever said that got it half right. Kahran 23:21, 17 October 2005 (EDT)
Peter, I recall your taking issue with some of the things in the "13" section. I found them, um... perplexing too. Turns out it wasn't completely off the wall. See above. --Watcher 01:06, 18 October 2005 (EDT)
I see the above (which is fascinating, actually), but still point out that the number "12" is never given, which is what was inappropriate about the mention. Silly is different from wrong. --Peter Farago 01:15, 18 October 2005 (EDT)