Talk:List of pilots/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 02:49, 8 December 2005

Capitalization[edit]

I don't particularly care whether or not the terms Viper or Raptor are capitalized, but according to Battlestar_Wiki:FAQ/Proper_BSG_nouns, they needn't be. --Peter Farago 22:59, 21 Aug 2005 (EDT)

Post-Pegasus[edit]

My purpose in maintaining this list was to keep track of the fleet's limited manpower, which was made quite a big deal of in "Act of Contrition". However, the number of possible pilots was clearly exceeded in the episode "Flight of the Phoenix", which seems to indicate that the showrunners are no longer keeping track. Furthermore, the episode "Pegasus" is scheduled to introduce several new pilots, which will probably make this even more difficult and fruitless to keep track of. I see two options here:

Note that the list covers the events of the Mini-series through "Final Cut" and leave it as a reference to those episodes.
Reformat to include Pegasus characters but keep track of them separately, using the following outline structure:

Active
- Galactica
  - Vipers
  - Raptors
  - ECOs
  - Others
- Pegasus
  - Vipers
  - Raptors
  - ECOs
  - Others
Deceased
- Galactica

...

or

Galactica
- Active
  - Vipers
  - Raptors
  - ECOs
  - Others
- Deceased

...

Pegasus
- Active
  - Vipers

...

et cetera. Do any of you have any thoughts? Is this even a useful resource, now that the showrunners are apparently not keeping track themselves? --Peter Farago 17:44, 21 September 2005 (EDT)

IMHO, I think it is still a useful resource. Pilots are not easily replaced, but the influx of people from the Pegasus will likely cause some issues with this list, skewing the numbers a bit. Just my .02 cubits. -- Joe Beaudoin 22:44, 21 September 2005 (EDT)

I think it's premature to decide the writers are not keeping track because of one effects continuity error. I would suggest that keeping track as much as possible and making careful judgements as to whether any further sorties seem plausible is still a valuable service. Even with the Pegasus squadron around as an unknown X factor we might get more dialogue indicating the number of pilots in the fleet. -- Dogger 21:37, 07 December 2005 (EDT)

Revision as of 02:44, 22 September 2005 view source Joe Beaudoin Jr. (talk \| contribs) Senior Chiefs, Marines, Interface administrators, interwiki, Sponsors, CAP, Chiefs 62,846 edits →‎Post-Pegasus: throwing in my view ← Older edit		Revision as of 02:49, 8 December 2005 view source Dogger (talk \| contribs) 61 edits →‎Post-Pegasus Newer edit →
Line 43:		Line 43:

	: IMHO, I think it is still a useful resource. Pilots are not easily replaced, but the influx of people from the Pegasus will likely cause some issues with this list, skewing the numbers a bit. Just my .02 cubits. -- [[User:Joe.Beaudoin\|Joe Beaudoin]] 22:44, 21 September 2005 (EDT)		: IMHO, I think it is still a useful resource. Pilots are not easily replaced, but the influx of people from the Pegasus will likely cause some issues with this list, skewing the numbers a bit. Just my .02 cubits. -- [[User:Joe.Beaudoin\|Joe Beaudoin]] 22:44, 21 September 2005 (EDT)

			: I think it's premature to decide the writers are not keeping track because of one effects continuity error. I would suggest that keeping track as much as possible and making careful judgements as to whether any further sorties seem plausible is still a valuable service. Even with the Pegasus squadron around as an unknown X factor we might get more dialogue indicating the number of pilots in the fleet. -- [[User:Dogger\|Dogger]] 21:37, 07 December 2005 (EDT)