Battlestar Wiki:Featured articles/Debate for November 2007: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:57, 26 October 2007

Debate for November 2007

Support This article is filled with the juicy bits that make reading Battlestar Wiki a joy. The layout, the detail, the references, all good. --Spencerian 22:04, 16 October 2007 (CDT)
Comment Looks good. Some more noms wouldn't heard, but I can't really think of anything. --Serenity 10:57, 26 October 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 03:04, 17 October 2007 edit Spencerian (talk \| contribs) Senior Chiefs, Marines, interwiki, Sponsors, Chiefs 9,127 edits +vote ← Older edit		Revision as of 15:57, 26 October 2007 edit undo Serenity (talk \| contribs) Chiefs 12,473 edits →[[CIC]] Newer edit →
Line 4:		Line 4:

	* {{support}} This article is filled with the juicy bits that make reading Battlestar Wiki a joy. The layout, the detail, the references, all good. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 22:04, 16 October 2007 (CDT)		* {{support}} This article is filled with the juicy bits that make reading Battlestar Wiki a joy. The layout, the detail, the references, all good. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 22:04, 16 October 2007 (CDT)
			* {{comment}} Looks good. Some more noms wouldn't heard, but I can't really think of anything. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 10:57, 26 October 2007 (CDT)