More actions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:The Chuck Norris reference should go. Maybe replace it with something like "Even Colonel Tigh and Doctor Cottle regularly lose against Adama's glare". Those two have some intense glaring and frowning going on themselves. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:41, 30 June 2007 (CDT) | :The Chuck Norris reference should go. Maybe replace it with something like "Even Colonel Tigh and Doctor Cottle regularly lose against Adama's glare". Those two have some intense glaring and frowning going on themselves. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:41, 30 June 2007 (CDT) | ||
::Good suggestion. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])</sup> 05:45, 30 June 2007 (CDT) | ::Good suggestion. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])</sup> 05:45, 30 June 2007 (CDT) | ||
:::Agreed and removed—Chuck Norris jokes haven't been funny since 2006. [[User:Philwelch|Philwelch]] 03:39, 14 July 2007 (CDT) | |||
Is it just me or are the feats ascribes to the glare way over the top? I think its effects should be described more subtly. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:04, 1 July 2007 (CDT) | Is it just me or are the feats ascribes to the glare way over the top? I think its effects should be described more subtly. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:04, 1 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
: LOL at my "professional opinion" ... but the glare is definitely worthy of a Silly page. The feats being over the top works, I think. Though a little subtlety is always a good addition, the best Silly pages seem to be a mixture of both. [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 07:02, 3 July 2007 (CDT) | : LOL at my "professional opinion" ... but the glare is definitely worthy of a Silly page. The feats being over the top works, I think. Though a little subtlety is always a good addition, the best Silly pages seem to be a mixture of both. [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 07:02, 3 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
::Yeah, some can be good, but in this case it's just way too much for my taste, and moves the page from being silly and amusing to groan-inducing. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 11:17, 7 July 2007 (CDT) | ::Yeah, some can be good, but in this case it's just way too much for my taste, and moves the page from being silly and amusing to groan-inducing. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 11:17, 7 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
== Picture == | == Picture == | ||
Revision as of 08:39, 14 July 2007
Looking good
This article looks good, though it could use a picture. Also, I'm not sure about the real-world Chuck Norris reference. JubalHarshaw, could you give your professional opinion on this one? --Catrope(Talk to me or e-mail me) 03:19, 30 June 2007 (CDT)
- The Chuck Norris reference should go. Maybe replace it with something like "Even Colonel Tigh and Doctor Cottle regularly lose against Adama's glare". Those two have some intense glaring and frowning going on themselves. --Serenity 05:41, 30 June 2007 (CDT)
- Good suggestion. --Catrope(Talk to me or e-mail me) 05:45, 30 June 2007 (CDT)
- Agreed and removed—Chuck Norris jokes haven't been funny since 2006. Philwelch 03:39, 14 July 2007 (CDT)
- Good suggestion. --Catrope(Talk to me or e-mail me) 05:45, 30 June 2007 (CDT)
Is it just me or are the feats ascribes to the glare way over the top? I think its effects should be described more subtly. --Serenity 05:04, 1 July 2007 (CDT)
- LOL at my "professional opinion" ... but the glare is definitely worthy of a Silly page. The feats being over the top works, I think. Though a little subtlety is always a good addition, the best Silly pages seem to be a mixture of both. JubalHarshaw 07:02, 3 July 2007 (CDT)
- Yeah, some can be good, but in this case it's just way too much for my taste, and moves the page from being silly and amusing to groan-inducing. --Serenity 11:17, 7 July 2007 (CDT)
Picture
Would be nice to have a picture of the Glare of Death. ;-) -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New 18:24, 3 July 2007 (CDT)
- Still working on finding a good one. If any one has any, feel free to add them. I think I barely comprehensible scientific diagram might be in order too. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by FulltimeDefendent (talk • contribs).