Spencerian (talk | contribs) →More discussion?: +more bell, but "cow" is missing |
→More discussion?: reply |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Did we need more discussion on this issue before going ahead for a formal vote? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 09:07, 7 June 2007 (CDT) | Did we need more discussion on this issue before going ahead for a formal vote? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 09:07, 7 June 2007 (CDT) | ||
:We can vote on it, but the proposal appears to lack information on ''who'' is going to do the handiwork. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 12:27, 7 June 2007 (CDT) | :We can vote on it, but the proposal appears to lack information on ''who'' is going to do the handiwork. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 12:27, 7 June 2007 (CDT) | ||
:: Right, we may want to get that ironed out before a formal vote. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 20:54, 7 June 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 01:54, 8 June 2007
Comments
Here's my first cut. Feel free to the adjust resolution (I'm not sure if I was too conservative, or too liberal for that matter). Some of our coolest ones that we have are actually 800x500ish, so I don't think 1024 would be THAT bad. Also, as we achieve more of a consensus somebody might create a subpage of this with a draft policy. I wanted to see if there were any major shifts in the consensus regarding the guidelines before I started hammering one out. --Steelviper 07:32, 5 March 2007 (CST)
- 1024*768 was just a suggestion off the top of my head. Aren't the pictures widescreen? If yes, then the resolution would be slightly different. Or we could say "1024*768 or a similar widescreen (16:9 aspect ratio) resolution". But doesn't NBC only want 400*400 pics? We'd still be above that. But then, we aren't just a picture storage site, so it might be ok. --Serenity 09:05, 5 March 2007 (CST)
- Most of the images are not in 16:9 format, and appear to have been taken by a camera. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 22:19, 5 March 2007 (CST)
More discussion?
Did we need more discussion on this issue before going ahead for a formal vote? -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New 09:07, 7 June 2007 (CDT)
- We can vote on it, but the proposal appears to lack information on who is going to do the handiwork. --Spencerian 12:27, 7 June 2007 (CDT)
- Right, we may want to get that ironed out before a formal vote. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New 20:54, 7 June 2007 (CDT)