Talk:Viper 2220 (Mark VII)/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Viper 2220 (Mark VII)/Archive 1
More actions
replyh |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
One is a Mk II, while the other is a Mk VII. Hence they can't be the same. I'd say we keep the two pages separate. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 15:41, 21 May 2007 (CDT) | One is a Mk II, while the other is a Mk VII. Hence they can't be the same. I'd say we keep the two pages separate. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 15:41, 21 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
: I (obviously) agree, since I was the one who happened upon this peculiar discovery... -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 16:05, 21 May 2007 (CDT) | : I (obviously) agree, since I was the one who happened upon this peculiar discovery... -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 16:05, 21 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
::Playing devil's advocate, I should mention the [[Viper 7961]] article, since it's another of the reused numbers. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:48, 21 May 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 21:48, 21 May 2007
One is a Mk II, while the other is a Mk VII. Hence they can't be the same. I'd say we keep the two pages separate. --Serenity 15:41, 21 May 2007 (CDT)
- I (obviously) agree, since I was the one who happened upon this peculiar discovery... -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New 16:05, 21 May 2007 (CDT)
- Playing devil's advocate, I should mention the Viper 7961 article, since it's another of the reused numbers. --Talos 16:48, 21 May 2007 (CDT)