Talk:Night Flight/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:47, 10 May 2007

Name Gleaning

The rending is hard, but magnification was sufficient to get one of two names there. Sadly, the second, which could be "Magnus" for all I know, is too covered to even guess at. --Spencerian 14:36, 9 May 2007 (CDT)

It's a weird name. I could understand night/instrument flight qualification (which doesn't make sense in this context) but as a ship name it sounds strange. --Serenity 14:44, 9 May 2007 (CDT)

It's a common American alliterative (see Wikipedia's disambig). Personally I find the ship's name less strange than Embla Brokk and the dreaded Faru Sadin. --Spencerian 14:50, 9 May 2007 (CDT)

About the "weapons" portion of the infobox... aren't we inferring too much on that one? -- Joe Beaudoin ^{So say we all - Donate} 19:05, 9 May 2007 (CDT)

Probably. I just copied it from Atlantia. I'll simplify it. --Spencerian 20:42, 9 May 2007 (CDT)

Whoops. Beat you to it. Yanked just about everything (since we really don't know anything about it.) --Steelviper 20:44, 9 May 2007 (CDT)

Well, it is a battlestar, so it has to have a basic battery, Vipers and Raptors, right? Wouldn't be much of one without them. --Spencerian 20:47, 9 May 2007 (CDT)

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 :Probably. I just copied it from ''Atlantia''. I'll simplify it. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 20:42, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
 ::Whoops. Beat you to it. Yanked just about everything (since we really don't know anything about it.) --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 20:44, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
+:::Well, it ''is'' a battlestar, so it has to have a basic battery, Vipers and Raptors, right? Wouldn't be much of one without them. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 20:47, 9 May 2007 (CDT)