Spencerian (talk | contribs) →Predictions: +reply to Straycat0 |
BklynBruzer (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
OK. The purpose of a talk page is for ''brief'' discussions and questions about the article. Generally, the humorous "predictions" in other talk pages have not detracted from the talk page's purpose or grown in size, and honestly have given me a chuckle, although my feelings on the matter aren't the sole vote about it. Provided that we don't get into numerous predictions from many users to the talk page in some way, I don't see a problem with it at this time. If there's still a problem about it, a silly page could have a bulleted series of such humor if approved by consensus (although I doubt this would work, [[BW:NOT|we're not a forum]]). Sometimes, predictions are fun ''and'' on-topic: See [[Talk:Exodus, Part II]] where I made a good guess. Now, what's considered "funny" is very subjective. I don't think BB's jest is nearly as humorous as, say, the shining white Final Five being revealed as the ''Jackson Five'' or something. Jokes are OK. If it's a bad one, ignore the poster. If a talk page gets too long, ask an admin to moderate if you can't get others to end a pointless or irrelevant topic. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 13:00, 19 March 2007 (CDT) | OK. The purpose of a talk page is for ''brief'' discussions and questions about the article. Generally, the humorous "predictions" in other talk pages have not detracted from the talk page's purpose or grown in size, and honestly have given me a chuckle, although my feelings on the matter aren't the sole vote about it. Provided that we don't get into numerous predictions from many users to the talk page in some way, I don't see a problem with it at this time. If there's still a problem about it, a silly page could have a bulleted series of such humor if approved by consensus (although I doubt this would work, [[BW:NOT|we're not a forum]]). Sometimes, predictions are fun ''and'' on-topic: See [[Talk:Exodus, Part II]] where I made a good guess. Now, what's considered "funny" is very subjective. I don't think BB's jest is nearly as humorous as, say, the shining white Final Five being revealed as the ''Jackson Five'' or something. Jokes are OK. If it's a bad one, ignore the poster. If a talk page gets too long, ask an admin to moderate if you can't get others to end a pointless or irrelevant topic. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 13:00, 19 March 2007 (CDT) | ||
:Damn I should've thought of the Jackson Five... --20:10, 19 March 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 01:10, 20 March 2007
Promo Pics
Are here. Hard believe that's the last for Season 3. However, they may release a few more for this episode. At least there's the 2-hr movie between seasons. --FrankieG 20:03, 27 February 2007 (CST)
That promo pic of Six, Baltar, and Hera appears to be shot in the "Final Five" room. Anyone else notice this? Paulmooreparks 19:57, 28 February 2007 (CST)
- Yes, indeed I did. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 20:02, 28 February 2007 (CST)
- Baltar's been having visions of Six and Hera in the opera house since season 1, so it's not necessarily connected to the Final Five. Since this episode will reveal 1 or 4 of the Final Five depending on which interview you go by, there's a pretty good chance that it relates to them as well. -- Gordon Ecker 20:16, 28 February 2007 (CST)
- Am I completely off-base in thinking that that's Virtual Baltar alongside Virtual Six? Because the other photos of that episode show the "real" Baltar still quite disheveled with a thick beard while that Baltar is clean-shaven, not unlike Caprica's Baltar. Didn't Ron Moore say something about the two alter-egos being key figures in the last episodes of the season? --Kahran 04:50, 3 March 2007 (CST)
- Not really "off base", in fact I think that's the most popular theory in general. So unless we're all off base.....which is admitedly possible :P --Sauron18 07:37, 3 March 2007 (CST)
- If they are able to interact with eachother it would have significant implications regarding their nature. -- Gordon Ecker 17:50, 7 March 2007 (CST)
- The virtual Baltar normally wears the unique pinstripe suit from the Miniseries, which I don't see here. I do believe this is a visualization and that is Virtual Six, for the Opera House doesn't exist. If the two alter-egos do somehow directly interact, some Serious Shit will ensure, but damned if I can really glean what. This is as big of a season stumper as season 2's cliffhanger. And, no, Kara Thrace will NOT be one of the Five. But it may be, in my guess, one of these three, although they don't realize it: Dualla, Tigh, or Gaeta. I still hold exception to the fact that what Three saw may be the five priests of the Temple of Five, who just so happen to have incarnations in the current timeline. (Note the monkey that exited my anus and is waving at you). --Spencerian 15:44, 13 March 2007 (CDT)
Predictions
Well, it's early, and I don't care to step on Slander's toes, but I have forseen an event in Crossroads, Part II. The top 5 American Idol contestants cameo as... THE FINAL FIVE! --BklynBruzer 18:06, 14 March 2007 (CDT)
- I'd like to make a motion that all Predictions in Talk pages be deleted as they are assinine and serve no other purpose than to promote the person making the prediction. Predictions should be in Forums and chatrooms or discussion groups, not here.--Straycat0 12:29, 15 March 2007 (CDT)
- Dude... they're friggin' jokes. No need to be so uptight. You're reminding me of Merv. --BklynBruzer 18:07, 15 March 2007 (CDT)
- Motion denied. Bstone 12:04, 19 March 2007 (CDT)
- Dude... they're friggin' jokes. No need to be so uptight. You're reminding me of Merv. --BklynBruzer 18:07, 15 March 2007 (CDT)
OK. The purpose of a talk page is for brief discussions and questions about the article. Generally, the humorous "predictions" in other talk pages have not detracted from the talk page's purpose or grown in size, and honestly have given me a chuckle, although my feelings on the matter aren't the sole vote about it. Provided that we don't get into numerous predictions from many users to the talk page in some way, I don't see a problem with it at this time. If there's still a problem about it, a silly page could have a bulleted series of such humor if approved by consensus (although I doubt this would work, we're not a forum). Sometimes, predictions are fun and on-topic: See Talk:Exodus, Part II where I made a good guess. Now, what's considered "funny" is very subjective. I don't think BB's jest is nearly as humorous as, say, the shining white Final Five being revealed as the Jackson Five or something. Jokes are OK. If it's a bad one, ignore the poster. If a talk page gets too long, ask an admin to moderate if you can't get others to end a pointless or irrelevant topic. --Spencerian 13:00, 19 March 2007 (CDT)
- Damn I should've thought of the Jackson Five... --20:10, 19 March 2007 (CDT)