More actions
→Recent rollback: unsigned comment |
→Recent rollback: +addition |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
If it was used in the dialogue, then I can understand its usage here. But you and (more importantly) the writers of the show are wrong that the usage is correct. Certainly not in reference to Hindu and Buddhist mandalas. For what it's worth, I do actually have a Ph.D. from Yale in Asian art history and have studied mandalas in detail. But I'm not such a prude as to think that the usage has to be exact in a TV show. But maybe it would be good to explain that the show's usage of the term is not really correct. The image is an icon, a symbolic representation of the nova, the Eye of Jupiter. It's not a mandala. Even if it was/is used in meditation practices, it would still be an icon, not a mandala. A mandala can have symbols and/or icons within it, but it is itself a diagram. A map, if you will. {{unsigned|Rasmus}} | If it was used in the dialogue, then I can understand its usage here. But you and (more importantly) the writers of the show are wrong that the usage is correct. Certainly not in reference to Hindu and Buddhist mandalas. For what it's worth, I do actually have a Ph.D. from Yale in Asian art history and have studied mandalas in detail. But I'm not such a prude as to think that the usage has to be exact in a TV show. But maybe it would be good to explain that the show's usage of the term is not really correct. The image is an icon, a symbolic representation of the nova, the Eye of Jupiter. It's not a mandala. Even if it was/is used in meditation practices, it would still be an icon, not a mandala. A mandala can have symbols and/or icons within it, but it is itself a diagram. A map, if you will. {{unsigned|Rasmus}} | ||
:Putting that in a few sentences in the notes section would be fine I guess --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 08:27, 24 January 2007 (CST) | :Putting that in a few sentences in the notes section would be fine I guess. That whole part about the use of the mandala would fit better there than in analysis --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 08:27, 24 January 2007 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 14:50, 24 January 2007
Welcome to Battlestar Wiki!
Welcome to the Wiki, Rasmus. Feel free to tell us about yourself on your user page. Before you get started on other edits, please read the Standards and Conventions, which details the policies we use in editing pages (this differs from many other wikis in its particular use of verb tense, abbreviations, formatting, and the like). If you need help in learning how to use the MediaWiki tools supported here, you can check out the tutorial and the wiki markup code pages for assistance.
Please read the articles "What is Battlestar Wiki" and "What Battlestar Wiki is Not." This important information details what contributions are acceptable in this encyclopedia.
We encourage you to participate in any projects on Battlestar Wiki, which work to enhance a particular subject or extension of the wiki. These include the Original Series Article Development Project and several language translations of Battlestar Wiki. If you have a new idea for a new project, visit the Think Tank, where we hash out large-scale ideas before implementing them.
Also, if you have any questions or suggestions you wish to offer, please feel free to do so either on an article's talk page that's relevant to the subject, the Wikipedian Quorum or the Administrators' noticeboard. Remember to sign your posts on any talk pages using four tildes (~~~~)!
We look forward to your contributions to the community! --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 07:26, 24 January 2007 (CST)
Recent rollback
I reverted your recent edit of the article, Rapture. The term "mandala" is correct in usage and in context for this article, but most importantly it was also used repeatedly in episode dialogue. While the mandala was obviously not seen in use as a meditative device, it had a religious element, and there are secular uses of the concept as well in real-world Earth. See w:Mandala for more. -Spencerian 08:07, 24 January 2007 (CST)
If it was used in the dialogue, then I can understand its usage here. But you and (more importantly) the writers of the show are wrong that the usage is correct. Certainly not in reference to Hindu and Buddhist mandalas. For what it's worth, I do actually have a Ph.D. from Yale in Asian art history and have studied mandalas in detail. But I'm not such a prude as to think that the usage has to be exact in a TV show. But maybe it would be good to explain that the show's usage of the term is not really correct. The image is an icon, a symbolic representation of the nova, the Eye of Jupiter. It's not a mandala. Even if it was/is used in meditation practices, it would still be an icon, not a mandala. A mandala can have symbols and/or icons within it, but it is itself a diagram. A map, if you will. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rasmus (talk • contribs).
- Putting that in a few sentences in the notes section would be fine I guess. That whole part about the use of the mandala would fit better there than in analysis --Serenity 08:27, 24 January 2007 (CST)