Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Battlestar Wiki:Featured pictures/Debate for January 2007: Difference between revisions

From Battlestar Wiki, the free, open content Battlestar Galactica encyclopedia and episode guide
Talos (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Steelviper (talk | contribs)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
* {{Support}} Roger, Houston, go for throttle up... buh.... --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 20:53, 26 December 2006 (CST)
* {{Support}} Roger, Houston, go for throttle up... buh.... --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 20:53, 26 December 2006 (CST)
* {{Support}} Aye, I like this one too. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 22:25, 26 December 2006 (CST)
* {{Support}} Aye, I like this one too. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 22:25, 26 December 2006 (CST)
* {{Support}} [[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 07:24, 5 January 2007 (CST)
* {{Support}} mm.. yumm.. nuclear missiles. [[User:MatthewFenton|MatthewFenton]] 18:31, 5 January 2007 (CST)
I think we should go through the FP procedure for this picture because we've already appointed our FA for Jan. --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 08:05, 8 January 2007 (CST)

Latest revision as of 14:18, 8 January 2007

Nuke Pic

  • Support C'mon people, they're nuclear frakking missiles. --BklynBruzer 17:45, 26 December 2006 (CST)
  • Support When I saw this, I said, "Somebody is putting that up on the Battlestarwiki as I speak." Awesome. (So that's where those frakkers were... --Steelviper 20:42, 26 December 2006 (CST)
  • Support Roger, Houston, go for throttle up... buh.... --Spencerian 20:53, 26 December 2006 (CST)
  • Support Aye, I like this one too. --Talos 22:25, 26 December 2006 (CST)
  • Support Shane (T - C - E) 07:24, 5 January 2007 (CST)
  • Support mm.. yumm.. nuclear missiles. MatthewFenton 18:31, 5 January 2007 (CST)

I think we should go through the FP procedure for this picture because we've already appointed our FA for Jan. --BklynBruzer 08:05, 8 January 2007 (CST)

Contents