Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Talk:Armistice Officer/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Armistice Officer/Archive 1
Spencerian (talk | contribs)
Joe Beaudoin Jr. (talk | contribs)
m Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
In the miniseries, Gaeta refers to him as the "courier officer". Should we move the page, or is the current title more obvious? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 16:30, 8 December 2005 (EST)
In the miniseries, Gaeta refers to him as the "courier officer". Should we move the page, or is the current title more obvious? --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 16:30, 8 December 2005 (EST)


:Since he hasn't a name, I just updated the page with that information. If we really don't have to move a page, we shouldn't, at least for a character that we will never gain more info about. I'll have a redirect page set for "Courier officer". --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 13:17, 13 December 2005 (EST)
:Since he hasn't a name, I just updated the page with that information. If we really don't have to move a page, we shouldn't, at least for a character that we will never gain more info about. I'll have a redirect page set for "Courier officer". --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 13:17, 13 December 2005 (EST)
Line 5: Line 5:
==Sexual Assault==
==Sexual Assault==
:''In an edit summary, CalculatinAvatar muses: "ponder changing "sexually assaults" but come up short"''
:''In an edit summary, CalculatinAvatar muses: "ponder changing "sexually assaults" but come up short"''
I think the wording is good. We certainly wouldn't have a problem with it if the genders were reversed. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 19:34, 22 April 2006 (CDT)
I think the wording is good. We certainly wouldn't have a problem with it if the genders were reversed. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 19:34, 22 April 2006 (CDT)


:Concur here. Six is forcing the officer to kiss her, preventing his escape. I think that's sexual assault in its basic form. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 13:01, 24 April 2006 (CDT)
:Concur here. Six is forcing the officer to kiss her, preventing his escape. I think that's sexual assault in its basic form. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 13:01, 24 April 2006 (CDT)
:Well, my thought was that such wording implies it went further than it did, but, as mentioned, I couldn't think of anything better. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar|CalculatinAvatar]] 13:24, 24 April 2006 (CDT)
::Frankly, I can't think that there was time to DO ''anything'', but getting the kiss of death is sufficient... --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 08:41, 25 April 2006 (CDT)
:It was a sexual assault -- the guy didn't really object, but he was understandably scared out of his wits. But the problem is that "sexual assault" is a ''legal'' term that covers a very broad range of actions. I've replaced it with a straight description of events. Maybe "forcibly kisses" is kind of an odd turn of phrase, but it is more specifically descriprive. --[[User:Evan|Evan]] 17:43, 6 July 2006 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 01:45, 11 April 2020

In the miniseries, Gaeta refers to him as the "courier officer". Should we move the page, or is the current title more obvious? --April Arcus 16:30, 8 December 2005 (EST)

Since he hasn't a name, I just updated the page with that information. If we really don't have to move a page, we shouldn't, at least for a character that we will never gain more info about. I'll have a redirect page set for "Courier officer". --Spencerian 13:17, 13 December 2005 (EST)

Sexual Assault[edit]

In an edit summary, CalculatinAvatar muses: "ponder changing "sexually assaults" but come up short"

I think the wording is good. We certainly wouldn't have a problem with it if the genders were reversed. --April Arcus 19:34, 22 April 2006 (CDT)

Concur here. Six is forcing the officer to kiss her, preventing his escape. I think that's sexual assault in its basic form. --Spencerian 13:01, 24 April 2006 (CDT)
Well, my thought was that such wording implies it went further than it did, but, as mentioned, I couldn't think of anything better. --CalculatinAvatar 13:24, 24 April 2006 (CDT)
Frankly, I can't think that there was time to DO anything, but getting the kiss of death is sufficient... --Spencerian 08:41, 25 April 2006 (CDT)
It was a sexual assault -- the guy didn't really object, but he was understandably scared out of his wits. But the problem is that "sexual assault" is a legal term that covers a very broad range of actions. I've replaced it with a straight description of events. Maybe "forcibly kisses" is kind of an odd turn of phrase, but it is more specifically descriprive. --Evan 17:43, 6 July 2006 (CDT)