No edit summary |
m Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus" |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Hope eveyone approves. --[[User:Grafix|Grafix]] 12:31, 15 March 2006 (CST) | Hope eveyone approves. --[[User:Grafix|Grafix]] 12:31, 15 March 2006 (CST) | ||
'Adama is now a surname'. Hasn't it always been? I mean, [[Apollo (TOS)]] and [[Athena]] were Commander Adama's children in the original. Wouldn't that make Adama their surname? [[User:Luke|Luke]] 20:06, 3 July 2006 (CDT) | |||
:No. They didn't have surnames in the original. He wasn't "Apollo Adama" in the original, he was just "Apollo". --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 21:42, 3 July 2006 (CDT) | |||
::But he would have been, techinically (though Apollo Adama sounds so stupid), wouldn't he? [[User:Luke|Luke]] 03:58, 4 July 2006 (CDT) | |||
:::No. Perhaps you're thinking of a patrynomic, like Apollo, son of Adama? --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 04:33, 4 July 2006 (CDT) | |||
::::No, I mean... oh, just forget about it, it's not that important.[[User:Luke|Luke]] 15:11, 4 July 2006 (CDT) | |||
== Lost Page == | |||
? I'm very confused :-) [[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 14:24, 21 January 2007 (CST) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:54, 11 April 2020
As there were no objections to splitting this page, I have started to do it.
I suggest that any page that gets the 30k+ warning when editing should be split.
Hope eveyone approves. --Grafix 12:31, 15 March 2006 (CST)
'Adama is now a surname'. Hasn't it always been? I mean, Apollo (TOS) and Athena were Commander Adama's children in the original. Wouldn't that make Adama their surname? Luke 20:06, 3 July 2006 (CDT)
- No. They didn't have surnames in the original. He wasn't "Apollo Adama" in the original, he was just "Apollo". --The Merovingian (C - E) 21:42, 3 July 2006 (CDT)
- But he would have been, techinically (though Apollo Adama sounds so stupid), wouldn't he? Luke 03:58, 4 July 2006 (CDT)
- No. Perhaps you're thinking of a patrynomic, like Apollo, son of Adama? --April Arcus 04:33, 4 July 2006 (CDT)
- No, I mean... oh, just forget about it, it's not that important.Luke 15:11, 4 July 2006 (CDT)
Lost Page
? I'm very confused :-) Shane (T - C - E) 14:24, 21 January 2007 (CST)