More actions
m entering : before Image link name |
|||
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
We already have [[:Image:Cylon resurrection.jpg]], which is clearer and clearly more visually superior than this image. Thus, ''delete'', unless anyone disagrees. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] 22:10, 2 March 2006 (CST) | We already have [[:Image:Cylon resurrection.jpg]], which is clearer and clearly more visually superior than this image. Thus, ''delete'', unless anyone disagrees. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] 22:10, 2 March 2006 (CST) | ||
:I agree that the quality is not the best (since it was made form the first available caps), but I don't think the other image is a good candidate either. The best choice would be a better quality cap from the same view. I just think this view from above gives more justive to the actual article dealing with the tank, since the promo pic shows almos nothing compared to this shot. So I call for a replacement with better resolution rather than full deletion. --[[Sauron18|Sauron18]] 3 March 2006 | |||
:Don't delete: Maybe if you get a better one of this exact same shot, but the "Cylon resurrection" image closeup doesn't show the entire vat; this pic does. Let's use it on the "Cylon rebirthing tank" page, but ''paired'' with the closeup. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] 01:02, 3 March 2006 (CST) | |||
: There has to be a better shot. Otherwise delete. It's to fuzzy. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 23:40, 17 March 2006 (CST) | |||
::It's fuzzy, but we need one from this exact same camera angle and I would not delete it until a better version of the same shot can be found. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 22:50, 18 March 2006 (CST) |
Latest revision as of 04:51, 19 March 2006
We can get rid of this one...
We already have Image:Cylon resurrection.jpg, which is clearer and clearly more visually superior than this image. Thus, delete, unless anyone disagrees. -- Joe Beaudoin 22:10, 2 March 2006 (CST)
- I agree that the quality is not the best (since it was made form the first available caps), but I don't think the other image is a good candidate either. The best choice would be a better quality cap from the same view. I just think this view from above gives more justive to the actual article dealing with the tank, since the promo pic shows almos nothing compared to this shot. So I call for a replacement with better resolution rather than full deletion. --Sauron18 3 March 2006
- Don't delete: Maybe if you get a better one of this exact same shot, but the "Cylon resurrection" image closeup doesn't show the entire vat; this pic does. Let's use it on the "Cylon rebirthing tank" page, but paired with the closeup. --The Merovingian 01:02, 3 March 2006 (CST)
- There has to be a better shot. Otherwise delete. It's to fuzzy. --Shane (C - E) 23:40, 17 March 2006 (CST)
- It's fuzzy, but we need one from this exact same camera angle and I would not delete it until a better version of the same shot can be found. --The Merovingian (C - E) 22:50, 18 March 2006 (CST)