Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Talk:Revelations/Archive2: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Revelations/Archive2
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Fredmdbud in topic Biers?
Serenity (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
m Archiving 11 thread(s) (older than 14d) to Talk:Revelations/Archive1.
 
(90 intermediate revisions by 29 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
A "Lt. Gonzo Pike" is also listed on the [[:Image:GoBetween260607.jpg|casting sheet]] for "[[The Ties That Bind]]" for what it's worth. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:01, 18 November 2007 (CST)
{{Template:Archive-bot
|maxarchivesize = 32K
|counter = 1
|algo = old(14d)
|archive = Talk:Revelations/Archive%(counter)d
}}


The convention report attributes the forest scenes to episode '''11'''. Since other reports state that they have shut down after episode 13, this like means that they are the same by episode numbers. "Revelations" is episode 10 however! --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 01:57, 20 November 2007 (CST)
{{ArchiveTOC}}
: Here's the thing though... is Katee counting "Razor" as one episode? If so, then that makes "Revelations" episode 11, by her count. Also, about 4.13... it seems that there are only 10 episodes "in the can", as far as I can determine. Also, production numbers can be taken out of order; it's happened before to series such as ''Babylon 5'' and even the original BSG. So, 4.13... Is ''that'' episode 11, or is that part of episode 10, which may be extended? Plus we have two missing episodes that are unaccounted for, 4.07 and 4.09.
 
: To be honest, it's a bit confusing. LOL -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &mdash; ''New'']</sup> 09:55, 21 November 2007 (CST)
{{newsection link}}
::Right. Counting "Razor" as one episode makes this correct again. That's probably the case. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 11:36, 21 November 2007 (CST)
 
== Starbuck's expression ==
 
I just re-watched the last scene, I'm fairly sure that Kara's smirking, she's the only one in the scene who doesn't seem disappointed. -- [[User:Gordon Ecker|Gordon Ecker]] 22:45, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
: Neither does Tyrol, apparently. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 23:00, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
 
::Tyrol is clearly chuckling to himself; Starbuck to me looks like she has her mouth pursed as part of an overall expression of concern.--[[User:Hylas|Hylas]] 23:15, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
::: I don't think he was "chuckling" to himself out of humor, but in a cynical "of course it would turn out this way..." attitude. Rueful, just like when he was taken to the launch tube and he looks at Tigh and smiled because he '''knew''' Tigh gave them up. He smiled at Anders in a similar fashion because he knew that Tigh gave them up even then. On Earth Tyrol just had a non committal attitude because he is already cynical as hell probably thinking of the absurdity of the situation. Starbuck had somewhat the same attitude especially with the "harbinger of death" prophecy ringing in her head. [[User:Hunter2005|Hunter2005]] 09:48, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
 
== Goof ==
 
In the scene in CIC where Felix gets up to retrieve the pills he knocked over, you can briefly see the shadow of his 'missing' leg and foot (tucked up behind him) cast on the floor just between him and his chair. . . oops! [[User:Centurion 51773|Centurion 51773]] 09:37, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
: Yep, big oops. Or is it a shadow from his [[Virtual beings|Virtual Leg]]? :P -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 10:05, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
::Yeah. Gaeta's leg is definitely the final Cylon. -- [[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 13:26, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
:::Well, other than Baltar's Baltar, nobody else has a virtual ''self'', so I think it's more likely that Gaeta has a virtual ''Tigh's'' leg. . . (Actually an eye disguised as a leg. Cylon projection. Wink wink nudge nudge.) :D [[User:Centurion 51773|Centurion 51773]] 14:54, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
----
::I believe that's already mentioned on our [[Continuity errors (RDM)#VFX Gaffes|continuity errors page]]. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])</sup> 10:49, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
:::So it is. Hadn't seen it. Here I thought I was being clever. Frak! ;D[[User:Centurion 51773|Centurion 51773]] 13:08, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 
== Temple of Aurora Mistake ==
 
I see that there's an ongoing mistake with the Temple of Aurora picture. Lee is looking at the picture of the Opera House on Kobol. Starbuck walks over and says it's the Temple of Aurora, but as she does so you can see Lee turning the page over. You catch [http://s36.photobucket.com/albums/e4/Werthead/?action=view&current=AuroraBook.jpg a very brief glimpse of the image he is looking at]: an open square structure inside a much larger chamber. It 100% resembles [http://s36.photobucket.com/albums/e4/Werthead/?action=view&current=AuroaWreckage.jpg the structure] at the end of Revelations. However, I keep seeing that people think the Opera House and the Temple of Aurora are one and the same and it's an error, which it isn't. It's actually slightly mistimed editing.--[[User:Werthead|Werthead]] 00:34, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
: Having rewatched my digital copy, I can see that you're correct. Lee does turn the page to what appears to be the structure on Earth in "Revelations", at least to an extent... What extent, I'm not entirely sure though, because, again, the picture that we see on closeup before panning upward towards Thrace is the exact same page used to depict the depiction of the Opera House on Kobol in Season 1 and 2. Which casts doubt on the intentions of that scene. It could be a simple editing mistake, or it could very well be an attempt to remove all reference to that page for some reason we don't yet know. While I'm up in Vancouver, I'll figure out what the frak is up with it, because that scene—and the sudden introduction of this so-called Temple—rankles my researching ass, personally. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 02:24, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
:I changed the note on the Aurora page to make it more clear where the real picture is. And I uploaded the picture above to BSWiki. It's now linked to in the same note. -- [[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 13:22, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 
== nyc? really? ==
 
i think the city shown at the end is sydney, look at pictures of it.
that would make sense of  the whole roslin/athena/hera/six/baltar operahouse vision.
ya'know, the sydney operahouse! -- [[User:Popon|Popon]] 23:17, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
: Your speculation is about as valid at this point as anyone else's. And trying to pinpoint it to any one specific place would kind of take away from the basic visceral impact to each viewer — "That could be *my* city."-- [[User:Fredmdbud|Fredmdbud]] 00:57, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 
== Biers? ==
 
Is there a reason why the Three in this episode is referred to as Biers? It seems like it would make more sense to refer to her as Number Three, but was she called that in the episode or something. I didn't want to just change it because it's been so long since I saw the episode.
:She's often referred to as D'Anna, which is short for D'Anna Biers, although the reporter was almost certainly a different instance, so... -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 08:18, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
::Also the fact that she is the only Number Three left in the universe, and a particular one at that.-- [[User:Fredmdbud|Fredmdbud]] 18:26, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:55, 2 November 2009



Starbuck's expression

I just re-watched the last scene, I'm fairly sure that Kara's smirking, she's the only one in the scene who doesn't seem disappointed. -- Gordon Ecker 22:45, 21 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Neither does Tyrol, apparently. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Battlestar Pegasus 23:00, 21 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Tyrol is clearly chuckling to himself; Starbuck to me looks like she has her mouth pursed as part of an overall expression of concern.--Hylas 23:15, 21 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
I don't think he was "chuckling" to himself out of humor, but in a cynical "of course it would turn out this way..." attitude. Rueful, just like when he was taken to the launch tube and he looks at Tigh and smiled because he knew Tigh gave them up. He smiled at Anders in a similar fashion because he knew that Tigh gave them up even then. On Earth Tyrol just had a non committal attitude because he is already cynical as hell probably thinking of the absurdity of the situation. Starbuck had somewhat the same attitude especially with the "harbinger of death" prophecy ringing in her head. Hunter2005 09:48, 22 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Goof

In the scene in CIC where Felix gets up to retrieve the pills he knocked over, you can briefly see the shadow of his 'missing' leg and foot (tucked up behind him) cast on the floor just between him and his chair. . . oops! Centurion 51773 09:37, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yep, big oops. Or is it a shadow from his Virtual Leg? :P -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Battlestar Pegasus 10:05, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yeah. Gaeta's leg is definitely the final Cylon. -- Serenity 13:26, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well, other than Baltar's Baltar, nobody else has a virtual self, so I think it's more likely that Gaeta has a virtual Tigh's leg. . . (Actually an eye disguised as a leg. Cylon projection. Wink wink nudge nudge.) :D Centurion 51773 14:54, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I believe that's already mentioned on our continuity errors page. --Catrope(Talk to me or e-mail me) 10:49, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
So it is. Hadn't seen it. Here I thought I was being clever. Frak! ;DCenturion 51773 13:08, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Temple of Aurora Mistake

I see that there's an ongoing mistake with the Temple of Aurora picture. Lee is looking at the picture of the Opera House on Kobol. Starbuck walks over and says it's the Temple of Aurora, but as she does so you can see Lee turning the page over. You catch a very brief glimpse of the image he is looking at: an open square structure inside a much larger chamber. It 100% resembles the structure at the end of Revelations. However, I keep seeing that people think the Opera House and the Temple of Aurora are one and the same and it's an error, which it isn't. It's actually slightly mistimed editing.--Werthead 00:34, 4 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Having rewatched my digital copy, I can see that you're correct. Lee does turn the page to what appears to be the structure on Earth in "Revelations", at least to an extent... What extent, I'm not entirely sure though, because, again, the picture that we see on closeup before panning upward towards Thrace is the exact same page used to depict the depiction of the Opera House on Kobol in Season 1 and 2. Which casts doubt on the intentions of that scene. It could be a simple editing mistake, or it could very well be an attempt to remove all reference to that page for some reason we don't yet know. While I'm up in Vancouver, I'll figure out what the frak is up with it, because that scene—and the sudden introduction of this so-called Temple—rankles my researching ass, personally. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Battlestar Pegasus 02:24, 4 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
I changed the note on the Aurora page to make it more clear where the real picture is. And I uploaded the picture above to BSWiki. It's now linked to in the same note. -- Serenity 13:22, 4 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

nyc? really?

i think the city shown at the end is sydney, look at pictures of it. that would make sense of the whole roslin/athena/hera/six/baltar operahouse vision. ya'know, the sydney operahouse! -- Popon 23:17, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your speculation is about as valid at this point as anyone else's. And trying to pinpoint it to any one specific place would kind of take away from the basic visceral impact to each viewer — "That could be *my* city."-- Fredmdbud 00:57, 4 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Biers?

Is there a reason why the Three in this episode is referred to as Biers? It seems like it would make more sense to refer to her as Number Three, but was she called that in the episode or something. I didn't want to just change it because it's been so long since I saw the episode.

She's often referred to as D'Anna, which is short for D'Anna Biers, although the reporter was almost certainly a different instance, so... -- Noneofyourbusiness 08:18, 23 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
Also the fact that she is the only Number Three left in the universe, and a particular one at that.-- Fredmdbud 18:26, 23 December 2008 (UTC)Reply