New page: This is my opinion and of course, it may not be the popular one, but the Special:Listusers link in this article seems rather, well, unnecessary. I do not want to remove it with out consen... |
Spencerian (talk | contribs) +comment |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This is my opinion and of course, it may not be the popular one, but the Special:Listusers link in this article seems rather, well, unnecessary. I do not want to remove it with out consensus.--[[User:Veepz|Veepz]] 16:47, 21 July 2007 (CDT) | This is my opinion and of course, it may not be the popular one, but the Special:Listusers link in this article seems rather, well, unnecessary. I do not want to remove it with out consensus.--[[User:Veepz|Veepz]] 16:47, 21 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
:It's a joke, of course, to the nature of documenting a fictional work to the point of obsession. Perhaps "[[w:fanboy|fanboy]]" would be a more appropriate link. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 20:10, 21 July 2007 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:10, 22 July 2007
This is my opinion and of course, it may not be the popular one, but the Special:Listusers link in this article seems rather, well, unnecessary. I do not want to remove it with out consensus.--Veepz 16:47, 21 July 2007 (CDT)
- It's a joke, of course, to the nature of documenting a fictional work to the point of obsession. Perhaps "fanboy" would be a more appropriate link. --Spencerian 20:10, 21 July 2007 (CDT)