Talk:Salvage and repair/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Salvage and repair/Archive 1
More actions
Agreed |
→No salvaging this one: reply |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Yeah. At best it's a redirect and even then I don't see why it couldn't be done with <nowiki>"[[Flattop|Salvage and repair vessel]]"</nowiki> in the rare cases it is needed. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 17:21, 25 April 2007 (CDT) | :Yeah. At best it's a redirect and even then I don't see why it couldn't be done with <nowiki>"[[Flattop|Salvage and repair vessel]]"</nowiki> in the rare cases it is needed. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 17:21, 25 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
:Agreed. Make this a redirect. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 19:33, 25 April 2007 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:33, 26 April 2007
No salvaging this one
This "telephone" article lends nothing to the Flattop article is and superfluous, like Hillary Clinton with an opinion. Marked for speedy delete unless we can make a convincing argument to spare its life. --Spencerian 17:01, 25 April 2007 (CDT) (Talk - Contrib Skillz - Edit Skillz)
- Yeah. At best it's a redirect and even then I don't see why it couldn't be done with "[[Flattop|Salvage and repair vessel]]" in the rare cases it is needed. --Serenity 17:21, 25 April 2007 (CDT)
- Agreed. Make this a redirect. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 19:33, 25 April 2007 (CDT)