Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Battlestar Wiki:Quality Articles/Cylons (RDM): Difference between revisions

From Battlestar Wiki, the free, open content Battlestar Galactica encyclopedia and episode guide
m forgot to sign again! argh ... need sleep
Catrope (talk | contribs)
add qa diff tag, sp
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{qa talk|Cylons (RDM)}}
{{qa diff|Cylons (RDM)|122402}}


== Summary ==
== Summary ==
Line 6: Line 6:
== Suggestions ==
== Suggestions ==


''Start the suggestion here...''
I've completed some aesthetic and informative adjustments to complete my notion of this entry page, adding notable links to improve its portal-like function. Comments? --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 11:35, 11 April 2007 (CDT)
:I'm really, really fond of this page. I think it's pretty much QA material now. Well done. [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 14:37, 18 May 2007 (CDT)
::Yeah, there isn't that much to it, so the article looks more or less perfect for what it's supposed to be. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 14:46, 18 May 2007 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 08:15, 20 May 2007

This archive is preserved in reference to Cylons (RDM)'s Quality Article status.
This archive contains the discussion used to help the Cylons (RDM) article achieve quality. The page revision that achieved quality status is here.


Summary

This is an excellent article in that it makes a great one-page intro to the Cylons of the Re-imagined series. It's also simple, elegant, and functional. JubalHarshaw 19:12, 10 April 2007 (CDT)

Suggestions

I've completed some aesthetic and informative adjustments to complete my notion of this entry page, adding notable links to improve its portal-like function. Comments? --Spencerian 11:35, 11 April 2007 (CDT)

I'm really, really fond of this page. I think it's pretty much QA material now. Well done. JubalHarshaw 14:37, 18 May 2007 (CDT)
Yeah, there isn't that much to it, so the article looks more or less perfect for what it's supposed to be. --Serenity 14:46, 18 May 2007 (CDT)