Battlestar Wiki:Featured pictures/Debate for June 2006: Difference between revisions
From Battlestar Wiki, the free, open content Battlestar Galactica encyclopedia and episode guide
More actions
April Arcus (talk | contribs) m name change |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{archive-message | {{archive-message | ||
| start = June 1, 2006 | | start = June 1, 2006 | ||
| end = June 7, 2006 | | end = June 7, 2006 | ||
}} | |||
= Candidates = | = Candidates = | ||
== [[:Image:Cylon resurrection.jpg]] == | == [[:Image:Cylon resurrection.jpg]] == | ||
| Line 24: | Line 22: | ||
== [[:Image:Viper7961 handofgod.jpg]] == | == [[:Image:Viper7961 handofgod.jpg]] == | ||
* {{support}} [[:Image:7961_HoG.JPG]] is of debatably higher quality. --[[User: | * {{support}} [[:Image:7961_HoG.JPG]] is of debatably higher quality. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 11:29, 5 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
**No, open the full sized ones up side by side. The HD one is defo better and so the other pic should be marked for deletion. --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] 11:31, 5 June 2006 (CDT) | **No, open the full sized ones up side by side. The HD one is defo better and so the other pic should be marked for deletion. --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] 11:31, 5 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
***The HD cap suffers from compression artifacts and has a sort of mushy tone to it. The DVD capture is much sharper, albeit of slightly lower resolution. --[[User: | ***The HD cap suffers from compression artifacts and has a sort of mushy tone to it. The DVD capture is much sharper, albeit of slightly lower resolution. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 18:38, 5 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
* {{support}} | * {{support}} April's right on this. There are artifacts in the HD version. The DVD version is much sharper. I therefore vote for [[:Image:7961_HoG.JPG]]. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 09:34, 7 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
**Its unfortunate that the HD image has been saved at such a low quality. --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] 12:30, 7 June 2006 (CDT) | **Its unfortunate that the HD image has been saved at such a low quality. --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] 12:30, 7 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
***I'll get a better version of this tomorrow, it's lower quality because I brightened it up to see the numbers. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 22:54, 22 June 2006 (CDT) | |||
== [[:Image:Insert Image.jpg]]== | == [[:Image:Insert Image.jpg]]== | ||
Latest revision as of 02:49, 13 April 2020
| ||
|---|---|---|
| DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.
This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current talk page. |
Candidates
Image:Cylon resurrection.jpg
- No votes.
Image:Gina-Cain.jpg
- No votes.
Image:Radalm 217 1080i.jpg
- No votes.
Image:33mincount 101 1080i.jpg
- No votes.
Image:PegasusForeBatteries.jpg
- No votes.
Image:Ep212battle.jpg
Support This gets my vote, though we have two images yet to decided. --Shane (T - C - E) 23:19, 4 June 2006 (CDT)- Support Yeah, this has always been one of my faves. --Mercifull 03:25, 5 June 2006 (CDT)
- Support I also vote for this one. --The Merovingian (C - E) 09:01, 6 June 2006 (CDT)
- Support Presuming I get a vote, I'm giving mine to this pic. It looks fantastic and it's much less familiar than some of the others(I think the one of the Vipers is featured in quite a few articles), but it's still a powerful image.--Pearse 09:52, 7 June 2006 (CDT)
- Support My vote. --gougef 15:45, 7 June 2006 (CDT)
![→[[:Image:Viper7961 handofgod.jpg]]](#Image:Viper7961_handofgod.jpg){kind=link}
Image:Viper7961 handofgod.jpg
- Support Image:7961_HoG.JPG is of debatably higher quality. --April Arcus 11:29, 5 June 2006 (CDT)
- No, open the full sized ones up side by side. The HD one is defo better and so the other pic should be marked for deletion. --Mercifull 11:31, 5 June 2006 (CDT)
- The HD cap suffers from compression artifacts and has a sort of mushy tone to it. The DVD capture is much sharper, albeit of slightly lower resolution. --April Arcus 18:38, 5 June 2006 (CDT)
- No, open the full sized ones up side by side. The HD one is defo better and so the other pic should be marked for deletion. --Mercifull 11:31, 5 June 2006 (CDT)
- Support April's right on this. There are artifacts in the HD version. The DVD version is much sharper. I therefore vote for Image:7961_HoG.JPG. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 09:34, 7 June 2006 (CDT)
