Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Talk:Battlestar/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Battlestar/Archive 1
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Joe Beaudoin Jr. in topic Battlestar Universa and Eos
Other Battlestars
Joe Beaudoin Jr. (talk | contribs)
 
(38 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
I think the "fan estimate" of 6-8 Viper squads is off. According to http://galactica.tv/colonials/galacticatv.shtml, the Galactica had only 2 Viper squadronsSince it was a museum ship, it's possible this is less than the usual complement.
==Change Disambig to Redirect==
I was working the [[Special:Disambiguations|Disambiguations Pages]], and I noticed that there are over 100 Battlestar links that go to the disambig page. I'd estimate over 95 percent of them intend to go to Original battlestar (RDM). Since there's already a disambig line at the top of that article, I propose that we change this page to a redirect to that one (after we redirect any pages that are intended to go to the TOS or video game spots). If there was equal amounts of content being added to all namespaces, I would argue for equality (and the disambig page), but since most of the new content being written will be about RDM (especially with how much progress has been made on the TOS pages) I think the average user would benefit from a redirectI'll go ahead and try to identify and fix the TOS and video game links, but hold off on a Viper-like disambig purge until it is determined whether or not we'll redirect. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 09:40, 18 January 2006 (EST)


-- John Reese
:Sounds good to me. Same is true for "Galactica", which has a similar redirect with disambig line at the top of the RDM page for those lost. We know that the wiki is weighted to the new show, so it makes logical since to get to the current info first. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 15:20, 18 January 2006 (EST)


-------
::Cool. I think I got all the video game and TOS references rounded up, so I think we'd be ok to switch it over. I'll wait until tomorrow morning before doing it, in case the anybody on the night shift has any objections. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 16:01, 18 January 2006 (EST)


Hi John,
==Battlestar Universa and Eos==
I spotted two more battlestars in my copy of Season Zero volume 2 that could be added to this section, Battlestar's Universa and Eos. I think Universa is a misspelling of Universal (as its only mentioend once) but Eos is definately spelled that way. I've added them to the list although if any one could find a picture of them I'd be happy to write out a page for them.


Thanks for contributing!  It's nice to see that the site's picking up now!
Universa looks to be a Mercury Class but Eos is of an unknown class. {{unsigned|These}}


Actually, there are bits of information on the Galactica.tv (or Galactica2003.tv) website that are suspect, such as Tigh's first name being "Paul", as opposed to the canonized "Saul". We mainly use the episodes for canonical information; the Zoic, as the Colonial Archivist (Ernestborg9) can tell you, is mainly conjecture unless canonical info shows up to disprove it.
: Cool. Actually, I think it's time for a category on just battlestars in general... -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 20:42, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 
::Agreed, actually I wonder if we could expand that and merge all of the current named, unnamed and Comic Book Battlestar page's into a single page.
However, [[Battlestar|Battlestars]] in general carry 6-8 sqads; [[Galactica]] does carry two.  (Or did, as I'm sure that the <i>Galactica</i> is now left with, at most, one full squadron of Mark IIs from the [[Mini-Series]], over the course of the series.)
--[[User:These|These]] 16:14, 17 March 2019 (EST)
 
:::A list of battlestars would be good. That way we get rid of all the short articles, like we did that resulted in the modifications to [[The Fleet (RDM)]] article. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 16:58, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
- Joe
 
== Other Battlestars ==
 
Since the encounter of the Pegasus we have learned of another type of Battlestar,  
will this page be edited in regard of this?
 
Another point is the appearence of the Galactica before the ship has been refitted
after the war. Is it clear that it had the appearance of the orginal show or is this
unclear?

Latest revision as of 16:58, 18 March 2010

Change Disambig to Redirect

I was working the Disambiguations Pages, and I noticed that there are over 100 Battlestar links that go to the disambig page. I'd estimate over 95 percent of them intend to go to Original battlestar (RDM). Since there's already a disambig line at the top of that article, I propose that we change this page to a redirect to that one (after we redirect any pages that are intended to go to the TOS or video game spots). If there was equal amounts of content being added to all namespaces, I would argue for equality (and the disambig page), but since most of the new content being written will be about RDM (especially with how much progress has been made on the TOS pages) I think the average user would benefit from a redirect. I'll go ahead and try to identify and fix the TOS and video game links, but hold off on a Viper-like disambig purge until it is determined whether or not we'll redirect. --Steelviper 09:40, 18 January 2006 (EST)

Sounds good to me. Same is true for "Galactica", which has a similar redirect with disambig line at the top of the RDM page for those lost. We know that the wiki is weighted to the new show, so it makes logical since to get to the current info first. --Spencerian 15:20, 18 January 2006 (EST)
Cool. I think I got all the video game and TOS references rounded up, so I think we'd be ok to switch it over. I'll wait until tomorrow morning before doing it, in case the anybody on the night shift has any objections. --Steelviper 16:01, 18 January 2006 (EST)

Battlestar Universa and Eos

I spotted two more battlestars in my copy of Season Zero volume 2 that could be added to this section, Battlestar's Universa and Eos. I think Universa is a misspelling of Universal (as its only mentioend once) but Eos is definately spelled that way. I've added them to the list although if any one could find a picture of them I'd be happy to write out a page for them.

Universa looks to be a Mercury Class but Eos is of an unknown class. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by These (talk • contribs).

Cool. Actually, I think it's time for a category on just battlestars in general... -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Battlestar Pegasus 20:42, 16 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Agreed, actually I wonder if we could expand that and merge all of the current named, unnamed and Comic Book Battlestar page's into a single page.

--These 16:14, 17 March 2019 (EST)

A list of battlestars would be good. That way we get rid of all the short articles, like we did that resulted in the modifications to The Fleet (RDM) article. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Battlestar Pegasus 16:58, 18 March 2010 (UTC)Reply