More actions
CoreyDanian (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Shouldn't we give the ''Flattop'' the real name given on Galactica2003.net ''Hephaestus''?--[[User:CoreyDanian|CoreyDanian]] 3 October 2006 | Shouldn't we give the ''Flattop'' the real name given on Galactica2003.net ''Hephaestus''?--[[User:CoreyDanian|CoreyDanian]] 3 October 2006 | ||
:No, sorry. Please see [[Battlestar Wiki:Citation Jihad]]. The Battlestar Wiki uses ''only'' information seen, mentioned, or noted from officiial sources. These include episodes, cast and crew information, and some merchandise. This article should help you know what's acceptable as a source. While Galactica.net may have an official source, we don't know for sure, so we generally stay away from such information until seen or noted by an official cast member. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 22:46, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | |||
::Serenity...I just pulled the information on there being "three" flattop-type ships in the fleet from the [[Fleet]] page. While the Carina and the V.E. appear to be correct, I'm not sure I'm comfortable with the vagueness of the third reference. Since you and I seem to be working on this issue concurrently, what do you think?--[[User:RUSnooky|RUSnooky]] 08:35, 15 June 2007 (CDT) | |||
:::Yeah, that is very vague. There isn't even an episode cite there. I'll leave this open for a bit. If there's no proof forthcoming, I'll delete both references. It's possible that someone saw a ship in establishing shots post-"The Passage", but that could just be the ''Virgon Express''. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 08:49, 15 June 2007 (CDT) | |||
::::That was my guess, that this ship is one of the two previously established.--[[User:RUSnooky|RUSnooky]] 09:19, 15 June 2007 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:19, 15 June 2007
Shouldn't we give the Flattop the real name given on Galactica2003.net Hephaestus?--CoreyDanian 3 October 2006
- No, sorry. Please see Battlestar Wiki:Citation Jihad. The Battlestar Wiki uses only information seen, mentioned, or noted from officiial sources. These include episodes, cast and crew information, and some merchandise. This article should help you know what's acceptable as a source. While Galactica.net may have an official source, we don't know for sure, so we generally stay away from such information until seen or noted by an official cast member. --Spencerian 22:46, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
- Serenity...I just pulled the information on there being "three" flattop-type ships in the fleet from the Fleet page. While the Carina and the V.E. appear to be correct, I'm not sure I'm comfortable with the vagueness of the third reference. Since you and I seem to be working on this issue concurrently, what do you think?--RUSnooky 08:35, 15 June 2007 (CDT)
- Yeah, that is very vague. There isn't even an episode cite there. I'll leave this open for a bit. If there's no proof forthcoming, I'll delete both references. It's possible that someone saw a ship in establishing shots post-"The Passage", but that could just be the Virgon Express. --Serenity 08:49, 15 June 2007 (CDT)
- That was my guess, that this ship is one of the two previously established.--RUSnooky 09:19, 15 June 2007 (CDT)
- Yeah, that is very vague. There isn't even an episode cite there. I'll leave this open for a bit. If there's no proof forthcoming, I'll delete both references. It's possible that someone saw a ship in establishing shots post-"The Passage", but that could just be the Virgon Express. --Serenity 08:49, 15 June 2007 (CDT)
- Serenity...I just pulled the information on there being "three" flattop-type ships in the fleet from the Fleet page. While the Carina and the V.E. appear to be correct, I'm not sure I'm comfortable with the vagueness of the third reference. Since you and I seem to be working on this issue concurrently, what do you think?--RUSnooky 08:35, 15 June 2007 (CDT)