Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Information for "Talk:Military Ranks (RDM)/Archive3"

Discussion page of Military Ranks (RDM)/Archive3

Basic information

Display titleTalk:Military Ranks (RDM)/Archive3
Default sort keyMilitary Ranks (RDM)/Archive3
Page length (in bytes)36,120
Namespace ID1
NamespaceTalk
Page ID3298
Page content languageen - English
Page content modelwikitext
Indexing by robotsAllowed
Number of redirects to this page0
Number of subpages of this page0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects)

Page protection

EditAllow all users (infinite)
MoveAllow all users (infinite)
View the protection log for this page.

Edit history

Page creatorRedwall (talk | contribs)
Date of page creation01:32, 30 August 2005
Latest editorJoe Beaudoin Jr. (talk | contribs)
Date of latest edit23:51, 5 August 2009
Total number of edits275
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days)0
Recent number of distinct authors0

Page properties

Transcluded templates (5)

Templates used on this page:

SEO properties

Description

Content

Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements.
Shouldn't Commander be listed as O-7 and Rear Admiral as O-8? Not even getting into the debate over the officer/flag officer status of the Commander rank (although it could go either way (the Colonial forces could have seven officer ranks)), but why is it listed as N/A? It's clearly higher than Colonel, which is O-6. --Kevin W. 21:05, 26 November 2006 (CST)
Information from Extension:WikiSEO