Information for "Talk:Military Ranks (RDM)/Archive3"
Discussion page of Military Ranks (RDM)/Archive3
Basic information
| Display title | Talk:Military Ranks (RDM)/Archive3 |
| Default sort key | Military Ranks (RDM)/Archive3 |
| Page length (in bytes) | 36,120 |
| Namespace ID | 1 |
| Namespace | Talk |
| Page ID | 3298 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
Page protection
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
Edit history
| Page creator | Redwall (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 01:32, 30 August 2005 |
| Latest editor | Joe Beaudoin Jr. (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 23:51, 5 August 2009 |
| Total number of edits | 275 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Page properties
| Transcluded templates (5) | Templates used on this page: |
SEO properties
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | Shouldn't Commander be listed as O-7 and Rear Admiral as O-8? Not even getting into the debate over the officer/flag officer status of the Commander rank (although it could go either way (the Colonial forces could have seven officer ranks)), but why is it listed as N/A? It's clearly higher than Colonel, which is O-6. --Kevin W. 21:05, 26 November 2006 (CST) |