View source for Talk:List of all episodes/Archive 1

==Season Two Comments==

Sci-Fi just officially announced the second season of BSG has been confirmed, thank the Lords of Kobol! [[User:Kuralyov|Kuralyov]] 18:06, 9 Feb 2005 (EST)

=== Frakin' A ===

About time they got off their business suited asses and did something right for a change.  :-) --[[User:Joe.Beaudoin|Joe Beaudoin]] 19:34, 9 Feb 2005 (EST)


Season 2 was more-or-less on the cards: the UK ratings cambined with international interest shown via bulletin boards, etc., demonstrated Universal had a market for the show; all that was needed were initial US ratings (hence the announcement after only 5 episodes aired,rather than hanging-fire and taking stock after the majority of the season had aired), to confirm the US domestic market. 

--[[User:Ernestborg9|Colonial Archivist]] 04:30, 11 Feb 2005 (EST)


==Episode Guide Comments==

Is there any reason for the sub-headings ("Part I" and "Part II") under the mini-series in the episode guide list? Given the excellent analysis Joe has put together (with ample opportunity for additions on notes, etc.), the sub-heading appear redundant - epecially when the mini hasn't '''necessarily''' been aired in two parts in  all markets. Such a split could also cause irritation should information be split between the two sub-articles (given the need for people to page back and forth). IF such a split is needed - why not simply include the two parts as sub-headings '''within''' the main mini-series article? 

--[[User:Ernestborg9|Colonial Archivist]] 04:30, 11 Feb 2005 (EST)

== Please DO NOT Seperate the Mini-Series Entry ==

While I understand the mini-series was aired as two parts in different markets (and even a truncated 3 hour version on USA's NBC TV), the entire 4 hour mini is '''considered one (1) piece of work'''.  

'''Therefore, please (for the love of the [[Lords of Kobol]]) do not separate the entry on the Episode Guide page.''' (Or otherwise I will correct again and again until the skin of my fingers becomes raw and the keyboard becomes one big red blot on my desk.)

Thank you for your attention. -- [[User:Joe.Beaudoin|Joe Beaudoin]] 17:56, 2 May 2005 (EDT)

== SciFi.com Summaries? ==
Joe, what's the low-down on using scifi.com's episode summaries? I was thinking we could add it to our summary as a separate section, i.e., the "fan" summary (which is more in depth), and the "offical" summary (which is more like a blurb). Could we do this, as long as we give credit and link to scifi.com, or would it mess with copyrights too much? [[User:Colonial one|Colonial one]] 16:23, 27 August 2005 (EDT)
: I don't see why not. It should be in its own separate section, however. -- 
[[User:Joe.Beaudoin|Joe Beaudoin]] 17:28, 27 August 2005 (EDT)
::My thoughts exactly. Will start on that. [[User:Colonial one|Colonial one]] 21:06, 27 August 2005 (EDT)
:::Tried it out [[Scattered | here]] for starters. See new section 3. Comments/input from all welcomed. [[User:Colonial one|Colonial one]] 21:19, 27 August 2005 (EDT)

== Episode 5 and 6 ==

Before Exodus was decided to be a 2-parter, didn't I read that Episode 5 and 6 was a two-parter (Episodes 5 and 6 are a two-part story in which Galactica discovers a dying Cylon Baseship, and deals with a plague that has befallen the Cylons) which would now be Episode 6 and 7 with "Hero" being Episode 8, Unfinished Business, 9, etc. I don't think the second part (originally 6) has been titled or maybe it just part II. Could "Hero" be the second part? However, "Hero" has been referred as Episode 7 for awhile--[[User:Gougef|FrankieG]] 19:53, 28 July 2006 (CDT)
:I am confused... --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 19:55, 28 July 2006 (CDT)
::Sorry Merv! I missed this your reply [[Sources_talk:Season_3_Episode_Titles|here]]. Merv is ahead of me again :-). --[[User:Gougef|FrankieG]] 20:03, 28 July 2006 (CDT)
:::"Does my reputation precede me, or was I too fast for it?", Zapp Brannigan, ''Futurama''.  --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 20:08, 28 July 2006 (CDT)

== Navigation Links  To Episode Guide Portal Requested ==
Can some administrator who knows how please add a link to this page in the left-hand navigation structure?
This page is probably THE most important page in the whole wiki !

Also, I don't see any kind of "site map" anwhere. [[User:Ace Frahm|Ace Frahm]] 17:23, 15 December 2007 (CST)

: The sidebar links are doable... but a sitemap is unnecessary, since we already have both a [[Battlestar Wiki:Portals|Portal]] and a [[Battlestar Wiki:Categories|category]] system, both of which work much the same way as a site map. :) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &mdash; ''New'']</sup> 17:28, 15 December 2007 (CST)
:I think it's a sensible request. I don't use the page that often, but there were some instances where searching for it took unnecessarily long because it's somewhat hidden. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:30, 16 December 2007 (CST)