| Display title | Talk:Class-D nuclear warhead/Archive 1 |
| Default sort key | Class-D nuclear warhead/Archive 1 |
| Page length (in bytes) | 9,819 |
| Namespace ID | 1 |
| Namespace | Talk |
| Page ID | 6778 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Page creator | Evan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 03:33, 28 March 2006 |
| Latest editor | Joe Beaudoin Jr. (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 01:45, 11 April 2020 |
| Total number of edits | 32 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | I really don't know what level of speculation is appropriate here. I wouldn't have gone off on this nuclear bomb design digression, except that the previous revision was really confusing and seemed to imply that the Class D was implausible, which I don't think it is. Battlestars are jumping around at... |
