(kill this; salvage polygons?) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Yep, though the general idea of recording what's shaped differently in a central list might have merit. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar|CalculatinAvatar]]<sup>([[Special:Contributions/CalculatinAvatar|C]]-[[User talk:CalculatinAvatar|T]])</sup> 18:25, 12 May 2006 (CDT) | :Yep, though the general idea of recording what's shaped differently in a central list might have merit. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar|CalculatinAvatar]]<sup>([[Special:Contributions/CalculatinAvatar|C]]-[[User talk:CalculatinAvatar|T]])</sup> 18:25, 12 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
::This is almost an element of the series that "hides in plain sight" -- I was suprised to arrive here and discover nothing written about it. The polygonal/crystalline geometry is a significant distinguishing characteristic of the show (it probably says something about the cultural evolution of these people and their technology; we had rolled sheets cut into segments, squares/rectangles. What did they have? Perhaps something like friable basalt megaliths?). Does it carry over from the original series? Whether it does or not, nearly every aspect of the visible production is permeated by it. Thus, I would advise against total deletion. ([[User:Vektor|Vektor]] 03:50, 13 May 2006 (CDT)) | |||
Revision as of 08:50, 13 May 2006
Telephone? --Peter Farago 15:22, 12 May 2006 (CDT)
- Yep, though the general idea of recording what's shaped differently in a central list might have merit. --CalculatinAvatar(C-T) 18:25, 12 May 2006 (CDT)
- This is almost an element of the series that "hides in plain sight" -- I was suprised to arrive here and discover nothing written about it. The polygonal/crystalline geometry is a significant distinguishing characteristic of the show (it probably says something about the cultural evolution of these people and their technology; we had rolled sheets cut into segments, squares/rectangles. What did they have? Perhaps something like friable basalt megaliths?). Does it carry over from the original series? Whether it does or not, nearly every aspect of the visible production is permeated by it. Thus, I would advise against total deletion. (Vektor 03:50, 13 May 2006 (CDT))