Talk:Armistice Officer/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Armistice Officer/Archive 1
Spencerian (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
April Arcus (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Since he hasn't a name, I just updated the page with that information. If we really don't have to move a page, we shouldn't, at least for a character that we will never gain more info about. I'll have a redirect page set for "Courier officer". --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 13:17, 13 December 2005 (EST) | :Since he hasn't a name, I just updated the page with that information. If we really don't have to move a page, we shouldn't, at least for a character that we will never gain more info about. I'll have a redirect page set for "Courier officer". --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 13:17, 13 December 2005 (EST) | ||
==Sexual Assault== | |||
:''In an edit summary, CalculatinAvatar muses: "ponder changing "sexually assaults" but come up short"'' | |||
I think the wording is good. We certainly wouldn't have a problem with it if the genders were reversed. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 19:34, 22 April 2006 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 00:34, 23 April 2006
In the miniseries, Gaeta refers to him as the "courier officer". Should we move the page, or is the current title more obvious? --Peter Farago 16:30, 8 December 2005 (EST)
- Since he hasn't a name, I just updated the page with that information. If we really don't have to move a page, we shouldn't, at least for a character that we will never gain more info about. I'll have a redirect page set for "Courier officer". --Spencerian 13:17, 13 December 2005 (EST)
Sexual Assault
- In an edit summary, CalculatinAvatar muses: "ponder changing "sexually assaults" but come up short"
I think the wording is good. We certainly wouldn't have a problem with it if the genders were reversed. --Peter Farago 19:34, 22 April 2006 (CDT)