Steelviper (talk | contribs) (copyright question) |
(Style question) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Cornell Student Copyright== | == Cornell Student Copyright== | ||
I left the Cornell class off the copyright since I couldn't think of any meaningful way of uniquely attributing them. Should I add something about them in the header copyright or just leave them off? --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 11:25, 8 November 2006 (CST) | I left the Cornell class off the copyright since I couldn't think of any meaningful way of uniquely attributing them. Should I add something about them in the header copyright or just leave them off? --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 11:25, 8 November 2006 (CST) | ||
== Transcript Conventions == | |||
There's a couple points in Act 1 where RDM mentions "Exodus" but doesn't specify whether he means Part 1 or Part 2, although it's clear from context. Should the part number be added in the link only, or should it be expanded in the transcript as if he had actually said, e.g., "Exodus:Part 1"? My instinct is for the former. --[[User:PrePressChris|PrePressChris]] 11:32, 29 November 2006 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 17:32, 29 November 2006
Cornell Student Copyright
I left the Cornell class off the copyright since I couldn't think of any meaningful way of uniquely attributing them. Should I add something about them in the header copyright or just leave them off? --Steelviper 11:25, 8 November 2006 (CST)
Transcript Conventions
There's a couple points in Act 1 where RDM mentions "Exodus" but doesn't specify whether he means Part 1 or Part 2, although it's clear from context. Should the part number be added in the link only, or should it be expanded in the transcript as if he had actually said, e.g., "Exodus:Part 1"? My instinct is for the former. --PrePressChris 11:32, 29 November 2006 (CST)