Battlestar Wiki talk:Why Battlestar Wiki doesn't use the GFDL: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Battlestar Wiki:Why Battlestar Wiki doesn't use the GFDL
April Arcus (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(anochronistic) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Does the Creative Commons license forbid a GFDL source like wikipedia from using our contributions? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:24, 12 September 2005 (EDT) | Does the Creative Commons license forbid a GFDL source like wikipedia from using our contributions? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:24, 12 September 2005 (EDT) | ||
== Anachronistic == | |||
Just as a note, it's not anachronistic so much as aimed elsewhere. Its real intention is technical manuals, particularly the documentation for corresponding GPL software. Such things don't have needs like allowing for fair use inclusions. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar|CalculatinAvatar]] 21:23, 26 April 2006 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 02:23, 27 April 2006
Does the Creative Commons license forbid a GFDL source like wikipedia from using our contributions? --Peter Farago 18:24, 12 September 2005 (EDT)
Anachronistic
Just as a note, it's not anachronistic so much as aimed elsewhere. Its real intention is technical manuals, particularly the documentation for corresponding GPL software. Such things don't have needs like allowing for fair use inclusions. --CalculatinAvatar 21:23, 26 April 2006 (CDT)