Battlestar Wiki talk:Think Tank/RfA Amendments: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 13:41, 3 August 2006

Eligibility to Vote Discussion

I propose that RfAs voters must:

Have contributed at least 100 substantial (not minor) edits
Have been a registered user of the wiki for no less than 4 months

Please begin discussion below, and keep your comments relevant to this topic in this section. --Spencerian 08:37, 3 August 2006 (CDT)

Discussion

Wikipedia doesn't have any such requirements, and they handle a lot more RFA's (and users) than we do. I think the important thing to remember is that all "votes" aren't created equal, and that a well thought out comment can (and should) have more sway than a one word support or oppose. The RFA process is more to determine what the consensus is than to generate a vote. After that, it's up to Joe. --Steelviper 08:41, 3 August 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 13:37, 3 August 2006 (view source) Spencerian (talk \| contribs) (Eligibility to Vote Discussion)		Revision as of 13:41, 3 August 2006 (view source) Steelviper (talk \| contribs) (→‎Discussion) Newer edit →
Line 9:		Line 9:

	===Discussion===		===Discussion===
			Wikipedia doesn't have any such requirements, and they handle a lot more RFA's (and users) than we do. I think the important thing to remember is that all "votes" aren't created equal, and that a well thought out comment can (and should) have more sway than a one word support or oppose. The RFA process is more to determine what the consensus is than to generate a vote. After that, it's up to Joe. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 08:41, 3 August 2006 (CDT)