More actions
Added image to talk page so that it doesnt show in the Unused images page. --Mercifull 05:59, 4 April 2006 (CDT)
- What?--The Merovingian (C - E) 15:38, 4 April 2006 (CDT)
- Mercifull is acutely aware that images that are on the unused images report quickly end up on "the island" (or even disappear). That image was uploaded for potential use as the "logo" in a "Featured Article" template. However, it seems a bit small for that purpose. It probably belongs on the island, or maybe even deleted/reuploaded/reworked. --Steelviper 15:43, 4 April 2006 (CDT)
- Okay. One day I really want our front page to look like Memory Alpha's front page. --The Merovingian (C - E) 15:56, 4 April 2006 (CDT)
- I think v1.6 of mediawiki will allow some of the Portal-like features they have on their main page with out all the ugly html. Although, honestly, if we could get it to look like memory-alpha WITH ugly hacks and html (even without v1.6) I'd be up for it. --Steelviper 16:07, 4 April 2006 (CDT)
- I don't understand computers at all. Just scifi shows. --The Merovingian (C - E) 16:09, 4 April 2006 (CDT)
- I think v1.6 of mediawiki will allow some of the Portal-like features they have on their main page with out all the ugly html. Although, honestly, if we could get it to look like memory-alpha WITH ugly hacks and html (even without v1.6) I'd be up for it. --Steelviper 16:07, 4 April 2006 (CDT)
- Okay. One day I really want our front page to look like Memory Alpha's front page. --The Merovingian (C - E) 15:56, 4 April 2006 (CDT)
- Mercifull is acutely aware that images that are on the unused images report quickly end up on "the island" (or even disappear). That image was uploaded for potential use as the "logo" in a "Featured Article" template. However, it seems a bit small for that purpose. It probably belongs on the island, or maybe even deleted/reuploaded/reworked. --Steelviper 15:43, 4 April 2006 (CDT)
What should be the Standards?
Me and Silverviper talked about it for a short while (See below) and came up with those ideas. Now I know we been discussion Battlestar_Wiki:Quality_Articles, but there is a difference. QA are articles that are good enough to be a QA, but not enough to be Featured on the Main Page of the site. Some of the same Criteria for QA can also be established for FA, but FA most go through a more different process for it to be posted on the Main Page. That's all I can think of now. --Shane (C - E) 20:46, 19 March 2006 (CST)
Google Chat Discussions
Mar 17: Me (Shane) and Matt (Steelviper)
Matt: I'd lean towards deletion in its stated form, it's pretty redundant with featured article 1:37 PM in order to be a featured article, an article must possess a certain standard of quality (wow... you can quote me on that) 1:38 PM me: (saved! looved google talk) Matt: maybe list out some criteria... no broken links no spelling/grammar issues me: Some images Matt: citations for all info yeah images are a must me: More than one 1:39 PM Size Matt: at least one me: To large hard to read to small.. not enough content Matt: I wouldn't hold size against a page that would have dq'd the miniseries article 1:40 PM stubs are definitely out me: aye Matt: it'd be good to quantify a minimum size
- Just a note: Matt==Steelviper. Sylverviper is a far more artistic soul on the skiffy boards. --Steelviper 20:58, 19 March 2006 (CST)